Full Tutorial: GPT-5 vs Claude 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 for 10 Tasks (Oct 2025)
Channel: Peter Yang
Uploaded:
Duration: PT1390S
Read a transcript preview of “Full Tutorial: GPT-5 vs Claude 4.5 vs Gemini 2.5 for 10 Tasks (Oct 2025)” from Peter Yang, uploaded on 2025-10-29.
Transcript preview
Language: English (original, YouTube automatic captions)
[0:00] Hey everyone. All right. So today I want
[0:02] to share an updated guide on how I use
[0:04] chat GPT Claude and Gemini. I will also
[0:08] cover nine AI projects that I rely on
[0:10] daily and how I use deep research to
[0:13] make important decisions. So if you want
[0:15] to learn how I actually use AI to get
[0:17] stuff done, this video is for you. All
[0:20] right, so let's get started. Okay, so
[0:22] here's my table showing what
[0:24] capabilities each AI model has. I'm
[0:27] going to walk through each use case and
[0:29] then pick my favorite. All right, let's
[0:31] start with everyday answers. For
[0:32] everyday answers, GPT5 is fast and
[0:35] concise, which makes ChatGpt a great
[0:38] choice. Claw is pretty good, too, but I
[0:40] keep running into rate limits on the $20
[0:42] a month plan. So, my choice here is Chat
[0:45] GPT. Now, let's talk about writing and
[0:48] editing here. I think the winner is
[0:50] still Claude. Let me go ahead and mark
[0:53] Claude as the winner. And that's because
[0:55] I think Claude is the best writer and
[0:57] editor if you give it examples of your
[1:00] best writing. You know, Chad Chbt likes
[1:02] bullet points a little bit too much and
[1:04] generalized writing is way too verbose.
[1:07] Claw is my go-to here. And this is what
[1:09] I use AI for 80% of the time.
[1:13] Okay, so next for coding, it is a lot
[1:16] more competitive. And actually, I'm
[1:18] gonna mark two winners here. So, let's
[1:20] make two stars and let's get rid of
[1:23] this. And let's actually move chat GBT
[1:25] as one of the winners and claude as the
[1:28] other winner. And you know personally I
[1:31] prefer using cloud code but I have many
[1:34] engineering friends who swear by opening
[1:36] codeex