The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour (PBS) - 1993-04-14 (partial)
Channel: malgent
Transcript
Language: English (original, YouTube automatic captions)
[0:01] Funding for the McNeel NewsHour has been
[0:03] provided by PepsiCo.
[0:08] [music]
[0:19] Part of helping the world live and
[0:21] communicate better is keeping it well
[0:23] informed. That's why funding for the
[0:25] NewsHour is also provided by AT&T
[0:28] and by the Corporation for Public
[0:30] Broadcasting and viewers like you.
[0:34] >> A protest strike in South Africa turned
[0:36] violent today. It was called because of
[0:39] the weekend assassination of Communist
[0:41] Party and African National Congress
[0:43] figure Chris Hani. Black leaders had
[0:45] urged the strikers to keep their
[0:47] protests peaceful, but it did not work.
[0:49] Jeremy Thompson of Independent
[0:51] Television News reports.
[0:59] This was everyone's worst nightmare.
[1:03] Chaos in the heart of Cape Town.
[1:06] Fires burnt outside the city hall.
[1:09] Crowds of youths went on the rampage,
[1:11] looting shops,
[1:14] smashing windows, torching property.
[1:18] Vehicles were set alike.
[1:20] Security forces struggling to maintain
[1:22] control fired volleys of warning shots.
[1:30] Several people were in policemen. Even a
[1:34] peace monitor was hurt led away after
[1:36] being stabbed. The men of peace tried
[1:40] their best to hold the line. A
[1:42] distressed Archbishop Tutu blamed
[1:44] militant elements for trying to ruin
[1:47] Han's memorial day.
[1:48] >> That there are elements who are
[1:51] undisiplined and used have used this
[1:54] occasion or abused the occasion. The
[1:57] biggest labor stayaway in the country's
[1:59] history had started calmly in most
[2:01] towns, but later deteriorated into
[2:04] several angry confrontations with the
[2:06] police. Before a huge crowd in Suetto,
[2:09] Nelson Mandela had repeated his call for
[2:12] restraint.
[2:13] >> As members of a government in waiting,
[2:16] you have the responsibility
[2:19] to behave orderly and with dignity. But
[2:23] the greatest test of the ANC's
[2:25] credibility was being undermined as
[2:27] youths mobbed a Suetto police station.
[2:31] Suddenly the police opened fire. Live
[2:34] round scattered the demonstrators.
[2:37] The police who'd been told to act with
[2:39] restraint claimed they were just
[2:40] enforcing order. The result, three dead,
[2:43] five critically wounded, and scores more
[2:46] injured. Among them a BBC camera crew.
[2:49] The day of mourning for Chris Harney
[2:51] turned into mayhem.
[2:53] >> President Clerk ordered 3,000 more
[2:56] troops and police onto the streets. He
[2:58] said what happened in South Africa today
[3:00] cannot be tolerated in any civilized
[3:03] country. Robin US special envoy Reginald
[3:06] Bartholomew stepped up the pressure on
[3:08] Bosnia's Serbs today. He said if they
[3:10] did not sign a peace plan, the US would
[3:13] back lifting the arms embargo on
[3:15] Bosnia's Muslims. Bartholomew met with
[3:17] the Bosnian Serb leader in Belgrade and
[3:19] afterward told reporters what he'd said.
[3:22] >> Military and humanitarian powers have to
[3:24] stop now and that the Bosnian Serbs have
[3:28] to come to an agreement in the Vance
[3:31] process now. But does that involve
[3:33] >> and that this involves this involves in
[3:36] the first instance the line of march
[3:38] that we are on to impose tougher
[3:41] sanctions and you're all aware of this
[3:44] and it does involve the prospect of
[3:47] pursuing a lifting of the arms embargo
[3:49] should that prove necessary if in fact
[3:51] the Bosnian search do not come to terms
[3:54] come to a settlement in the Vansorn
[3:56] process quickly. Victims of Monday's
[3:59] Serb shelling of the besieged town of
[4:01] Sreanita were in the relative safety of
[4:03] a north Bosnian hospital in Tusla today.
[4:06] They were evacuated by a UN convoy
[4:08] yesterday. Many of the evacuees were
[4:10] children suffering from shrapnel wounds.
[4:13] According to UN officials, the Serbs
[4:14] unleashed another artillery barrage on
[4:16] Straitsa after the convoy left. It
[4:19] brought the two-day death toll to at
[4:20] least 64. Bosnia's Serb leader today
[4:24] denied his forces were responsible for
[4:26] the attacks. We'll have more on Bosnia
[4:28] later in the program.
[4:29] >> President Clinton continued the campaign
[4:31] for his economic stimulus package today.
[4:34] He said it would create 700,000 summer
[4:36] jobs and help cut the nation's
[4:38] unemployment rate by half a percentage
[4:40] point. He spoke to business leaders at a
[4:43] conference on summer jobs put together
[4:45] by the departments of commerce and labor
[4:47] in Arlington, Virginia.
[4:49] the jobs program that I have presented
[4:51] to Congress with the summer jobs, with
[4:54] the money for the cities and the
[4:55] counties through the community
[4:57] development program, with the
[4:58] infrastructure money
[5:01] is a small part of a big budget.
[5:05] It is an attempt to engage in an
[5:07] experiment to see whether or not
[5:10] with the economy recovering in terms of
[5:13] corporate profit. We can give a little
[5:16] goose to it, give opportunities to young
[5:20] people, create a half a million jobs,
[5:22] and maybe get the engine going again.
[5:26] House Republicans rejoined the attack on
[5:28] the stimulus package today. It passed
[5:30] the House, but was stalled by a
[5:32] Republican filibuster in the Senate.
[5:34] House Minority Leader Bob Michael said
[5:36] House Republicans would hold town
[5:37] meetings around the country this
[5:39] Saturday.
[5:41] >> Our role and responsibility is educating
[5:44] the American public to what really is in
[5:46] these specific proposals. And when they
[5:49] get to understanding it, reading the
[5:50] fine print like you have to do in an
[5:52] insurance policy, you get a a very
[5:54] different view. When you get beyond
[5:57] simply accelerating public works as an
[6:00] item or summer jobs, beyond that, you
[6:02] tell me where there's one additional job
[6:05] created, but additional spending. And
[6:07] that's the difference that has to be
[6:09] pointed out to the American people. What
[6:11] really is a job creator? White House
[6:14] officials said today a national sales
[6:16] tax was being considered as a way to pay
[6:18] for health care reform. Spokesman George
[6:21] Stephanopoulos said the idea had not yet
[6:23] been presented to President Clinton, but
[6:25] his healthc care task force was
[6:27] considering a wide range of options,
[6:30] including a so-called value added tax.
[6:33] There was still no verdict today in the
[6:35] federal trial of four Los Angeles police
[6:37] officers accused of violating Rodney
[6:39] King's civil rights. Deliberations ended
[6:42] early after the judge called all parties
[6:43] to the courthouse to announce that one
[6:45] juror was sick and being taken to a
[6:47] doctor. Deliberations are expected to
[6:49] resume tomorrow morning. The governor of
[6:52] Ohio deployed 500 National Guard troops
[6:54] to the Lucasfil prison today. Rioting
[6:57] prisoners there have been holding eight
[6:58] guards hostage since Sunday. The move
[7:01] came hours after inmates hung a banner
[7:03] out a window threatening to kill one of
[7:05] the hostages unless their demands were
[7:07] met. Seven inmates have been killed by
[7:09] other prisoners since the uprising
[7:11] began. Officials of the seven largest
[7:13] industrial nations met in Tokyo today on
[7:16] aid to Russia. The United States wants
[7:19] the group to put together a $4 billion
[7:21] fund to privatize Russia state-run
[7:24] factories. An overall package of about
[7:26] $30 billion is expected to be worked out
[7:29] during the two-day meeting. That's our
[7:31] summary of the news. Now, it's on to
[7:33] Bosnia. Managed competition in
[7:36] healthcare, Labor Secretary Rush, and
[7:38] the women of Somalia.
[7:49] First tonight, an update on the Bosnia
[7:51] story. Serb shelling of the eastern
[7:53] Bosnian town of Straanita continued
[7:56] today and so did international
[7:57] diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting.
[8:00] Yesterday, a United Nations convoy
[8:02] managed to evacuate nearly 700 Muslim
[8:05] women and children from Sra Bernita to
[8:07] Trusla. Jane Bennett Powell of
[8:09] Independent Television News has a
[8:11] report. We caution that it includes
[8:13] strong material.
[8:15] >> Last night's convoy brought civilians,
[8:18] women, and children with the kind of
[8:19] wounds soldiers get in battle.
[8:24] >> Of the 700 people evacuated from Sonita
[8:26] yesterday, 27 were brought to Tuslas
[8:29] Hospital.
[8:32] >> Surgeons operated through the night and
[8:35] were still in the operating theater this
[8:36] afternoon.
[8:43] These were the first eyewitness accounts
[8:45] of the intense shelling Serban has been
[8:47] subjected to over the last few days.
[8:53] By today, the medical staff were better
[8:56] able to assess the scale of the
[8:57] injuries, though some children like
[8:59] Essad still bore the number of his place
[9:02] in the truck on his unwashed face. He's
[9:05] in intensive care with internal bleeding
[9:07] from a shattered breast bone and a deep
[9:09] skin wound from shrapnel. He's six.
[9:13] Sadat, who's 16, was playing football on
[9:16] Monday when he was hurt. He came out
[9:18] with his mother, but his father and
[9:20] brother are still in Sonita. He has
[9:22] broken ribs and internal bleeding.
[9:28] >> I was in the school playground playing
[9:30] with the ball. One shell landed.
[9:35] There was a huge bombardment from the
[9:37] direction of Serbia and Bratina.
[9:48] >> Sead was also playing football when the
[9:51] first shells fell.
[9:54] >> Overnight surgery failed to save his
[9:56] sight. He'll never play football again.
[9:59] As the nurse explained,
[10:04] Shells hit the school. We heard 50
[10:06] people were killed there. He came alone.
[10:09] The doctor who had examined him said
[10:11] that these are serious eye wounds. There
[10:14] was more shelling last night and today.
[10:16] Eight more people died and three times
[10:18] that number were hurt.
[10:22] A UN aid worker described Monday's
[10:25] bombardment as intensive and systematic
[10:27] in its targets with bursts of three or
[10:30] five shells at a time.
[10:32] Radavan Carajic, the Bosnian Serb
[10:34] leader, said that after inquiries, there
[10:36] was no evidence it came from Bosnian
[10:38] Serb positions.
[10:41] In Europe, both proximity and heavy news
[10:43] coverage have produced political debates
[10:45] over Bosnia more passionate than those
[10:47] in the United States. And in Britain,
[10:49] some of the strongest language has come
[10:51] from Lady Thatcher, the former prime
[10:53] minister. Yesterday on British
[10:54] television, Margaret Thatcher said that
[10:56] Europe has become an accessory to
[10:58] massacres. Today there was an angry
[11:00] response from the government of her
[11:02] successor, Prime Minister John Major. We
[11:04] have a report from Ellaner Goodman of
[11:06] Independent Television News.
[11:08] >> Lady Satcha today went on the American
[11:10] breakfast shows to make the case for
[11:12] greater Western intervention in Bosnia.
[11:15] We can't pass by on the other side and
[11:17] see those terrible things going on to
[11:19] innocent people. I suggest therefore
[11:22] that we revive what was a previous
[11:25] policy talked about but not implemented
[11:28] of arming the Bosnian Muslims who have
[11:31] been prevented from getting arms to
[11:33] defend themselves by a United Nations
[11:36] resolution. The British government is
[11:38] firmly opposed to lifting that embargo
[11:41] but that opposition could lead to a rip
[11:43] with the new American administration.
[11:45] Today, Reginald Bartholomew, President
[11:47] Clinton's special envoy to former
[11:49] Yugoslavia, said on a trip to the region
[11:51] that the US would back the lifting of
[11:53] the UN embargo against Bosnia unless the
[11:56] Serbs signed a peace agreement soon. And
[11:58] he made it clear that American patience
[12:00] with the diplomatic route was running
[12:02] out given the atrocities being committed
[12:04] on the ground. In Britain, where MPs
[12:07] returned to Westminster after the Easter
[12:08] recess, Lady Thatch's intervention
[12:10] infuriated ministers. Some loyal Tory
[12:13] backbentures were privately going round
[12:15] saying that their former leader had
[12:17] flipped her lid. But other MPs on both
[12:20] sides of the house clearly shared her
[12:21] frustration at the impotence of the West
[12:23] to stop the killing. In an attempt to
[12:26] counter her arguments, the government
[12:27] agreed to make a statement. Using rather
[12:30] more measured tones than yesterday, the
[12:32] defense secretary said the government
[12:33] shared the sense of outrage about the
[12:36] attack on Sebranit. Madam Speaker, the
[12:38] government fully shares the widespread
[12:40] frustration that diplomacy and military
[12:43] pressure have not yet succeeded and that
[12:45] the suffering still continues.
[12:47] >> He stressed the sanctions noose was
[12:49] being drawn tighter. Then, without
[12:51] mentioning Lady Thatcher by name, he
[12:53] rejected her call to lift the arms
[12:55] embargo on Bosnia.
[12:57] >> Removal of the United Nations arms
[12:59] embargo would certainly result in the
[13:01] Bosnian Muslims being free to acquire
[13:04] all the weapons that they needed.
[13:06] Presumably the Botney and Serbs for
[13:08] their part would also seek more arms
[13:10] from other countries. The result would
[13:12] be to prolong the conflict and to make
[13:14] it even bloodier and more vicious than
[13:17] it is today.
[13:18] >> Turning to the calls for air strikes
[13:19] against Serbian positions, he did leave
[13:21] open the possibility that at some future
[13:24] point they might be justified, but he
[13:26] warned that they would fundamentally
[13:28] change the role of the UN. The clear
[13:30] military advice received by the
[13:31] government is that air strikes
[13:33] unsupported by substantial numbers of
[13:36] troops on the ground would be unlikely
[13:38] to be effective given the nature of the
[13:40] conflict, the weapons deployed and the
[13:43] terrain.
[13:43] >> Mr. Rifken was broadly supported by the
[13:46] opposition front benches.
[13:47] >> Madam Speaker, the Secretary of State is
[13:51] right when he says that we cannot lift
[13:54] the arms embargo to the Muslims. It has
[13:57] always seemed to us rather crazy to try
[14:00] and douse a fire with petrol. It never
[14:03] worked.
[14:04] >> Although the right honorable gentleman,
[14:05] I disagree about a number of elements of
[14:07] this matter. May I say to him that I
[14:09] believe him to be fundamentally right in
[14:11] resisting calls for the relaxation of
[14:13] the arms embargo.
[14:15] >> Mr. Rifkin was also backed by a majority
[14:17] of Toryback ventures. Would my right
[14:19] honorable friend not agree with me that
[14:21] the quickest available shortcut to a
[14:24] general Balkan war and an escalation of
[14:26] the conflict far beyond the borders of
[14:28] Yugoslavia would be to bomb Serbian
[14:31] positions?
[14:32] >> But Lady Thatcher's frustration was
[14:34] shared by a significant minority on both
[14:36] the Labor and Tory backbenches.
[14:38] Does the government not see that it is
[14:41] the inevitable consequence of the
[14:43] present policy that ethnic cleansing uh
[14:47] will continue its course and genocide
[14:51] will continue because there is nothing
[14:55] whatsoever being done by the
[14:56] international community to stop it. How
[14:58] many more millions of people must be
[15:01] driven from their homes
[15:02] >> and tens of thousands of people killed
[15:06] before the government before the
[15:07] government uh comes before that dispatch
[15:10] box with a policy commenurate with the
[15:13] genocide which we're witness
[15:15] >> and in the Lords this evening Lady
[15:17] Thatcher showed that the government's
[15:18] attempts to counter her arguments had in
[15:20] no way changed her mind
[15:22] >> the government have left the people
[15:27] although they have a right to
[15:28] self-defense without the means of
[15:32] implementing that right against a
[15:35] vicious aggressive.
[15:38] On the diplomatic front today, Russian
[15:40] officials proposed a meeting of foreign
[15:42] ministers of the five permanent members
[15:44] of the UN Security Council to discuss
[15:46] Yugoslavia. The Russians suggested the
[15:48] meeting take place after their president
[15:50] presidential referendum on April 25th.
[15:54] Still ahead, managed competition in
[15:56] healthcare. Labor Secretary Rush and
[15:58] Charlene in Somalia.
[16:02] [music]
[16:08] Now, another in our series on options
[16:10] for healthc care reform. A new survey of
[16:13] medical doctors found that twothirds of
[16:16] them favor a fundamental overhaul of the
[16:18] current medical system. And 58% of them
[16:21] in that Times Mirror survey said they
[16:24] support a so-called managed competition
[16:27] approach. President Clinton's task force
[16:29] on health reform may include that in its
[16:32] recommendations. So what exactly is
[16:35] managed competition? They already have
[16:37] such a system in California and Spencer
[16:39] Michaels of public station KQED San
[16:42] Francisco tells us all about it. Okay,
[16:46] open your mouth real wide. Real wide.
[16:48] Say ah. Ah. Ah. Good. Good.
[16:53] >> Fouryear-old Lisa Jackson and her baby
[16:55] sister Michelle are showing signs of
[16:58] retardation.
[16:59] Dr. Ronald Bachmann, a pediatrician and
[17:02] geneticist at Kaiser Hospital in
[17:04] Oakland, California, suspects that these
[17:06] young patients may have a complicated
[17:09] hereditary disorder.
[17:11] >> One of them has already had chromosome
[17:13] studies, cytogenetic studies. That
[17:14] that's a test that's close to $1,000.
[17:17] And then we'll do molecular testing, DNA
[17:19] testing for something called Pragillex,
[17:21] which is uh one of the newer diagnosed
[17:26] uh retardation syndromes as well as
[17:28] doing some other chemical testing or
[17:29] metabolic testing as they're called.
[17:32] Such state-of-the-art procedures like
[17:34] most new medical technologies are
[17:36] expensive and their increased use is one
[17:39] reason healthcare costs are spiraling
[17:41] out of control. They currently make up
[17:44] nearly 15% of gross national products.
[17:48] In California, even Kaiser, the nation's
[17:50] largest health maintenance organization,
[17:52] which prides itself on quality, lowcost
[17:55] care, is now being pressured to hold the
[17:58] line. Some health care planners believe
[18:01] that cutting cost is a simple matter of
[18:04] market economics, where price is king.
[18:10] Welcome to Price Club, one of a growing
[18:12] number of discount warehouse stores.
[18:15] True, the frills are few, selection is
[18:17] limited, and the packages give the term
[18:20] economy size new meaning, but shoppers
[18:23] are lured by bargain prices kept low by
[18:26] the outlet's enormous buying power. That
[18:29] principle may work elsewhere.
[18:32] health care, physical examinations,
[18:34] vaccinations, operations, they don't
[18:37] bear much resemblance to the products on
[18:39] these shelves. But in California, the
[18:42] people who manage a health care system
[18:44] for public employees have figured out
[18:46] that they can buy health care the same
[18:48] way that Price Club buys toilet paper or
[18:51] dog food. And then they can pass the
[18:54] savings along to their members. Volume
[18:56] purchasing is an excellent idea. It's
[18:58] been used throughout the American
[18:59] economy and every other sector that I
[19:01] can think of. and it's about time we
[19:03] start using it in the healthcare
[19:04] business.
[19:05] >> Tom Elen buys health insurance for
[19:07] nearly 900,000 government workers in
[19:10] California. They are members of
[19:12] Sacramentobased Calpers, the public
[19:15] employee retirement system, which
[19:17] manages health benefits for active as
[19:19] well as retired employees of hundreds of
[19:22] public agencies throughout the state. In
[19:25] 1991, fed up with ever escalating
[19:28] premiums and constrained by a tightening
[19:30] state budget, Elen got tough with
[19:33] insurers, Kalpers sought volume
[19:36] discounts from about 20 companies and
[19:39] then let its members choose their
[19:41] coverage from among those competing
[19:43] plans. This system is as close to a
[19:46] model of what President Clinton calls
[19:48] managed competition as exists in the
[19:51] nation. The idea of getting hundreds of
[19:54] employers together to purchase health
[19:56] care using purchasing power and
[19:58] spreading the cost administration over
[20:00] lots of employers uh from our experience
[20:02] is a pretty good idea.
[20:05] Benefiting from Kalpers's clout of the
[20:07] seven employees of the Castro Valley
[20:09] Sanitary District who clean and maintain
[20:12] the sewers near Oakland. Average health
[20:15] insurance premiums for Kalpers members
[20:17] will go up just 1.5% this year.
[20:21] far below the national average of 10 to
[20:24] 15%.
[20:25] That's why district manager Mary
[20:27] Fredette recommended a change from the
[20:29] county insurance plan.
[20:32] >> The last year that we were with the
[20:34] county, our fee for service plan, which
[20:35] was Blue Cross, had increased or was
[20:38] projected to increase 44%.
[20:40] >> What kind of savings did you get under
[20:42] the CalPERS plan? The first year that we
[20:45] were there, our our fee for service
[20:47] plan, which was roughly comparable to
[20:50] the Blue Cross that we had had under
[20:52] Alama County, decreased
[20:55] between 22 and 33%.
[20:57] >> You mean the amount you were paying that
[20:58] the district had to pay went down that
[21:00] much?
[21:01] >> The amount that the district had to pay
[21:02] went down that much.
[21:04] Such savings convinced Stanford Business
[21:06] School professor Alan Endhovven, one of
[21:09] the originators of the managed
[21:10] competition theory that Calpers is on
[21:14] the right track.
[21:15] >> I think as a model of a purchasing
[21:17] cooperative, it is excellent. It works
[21:20] very well.
[21:20] >> Does that make it manage competition?
[21:23] >> Uh, not yet.
[21:25] And Hovind believes that health care
[21:27] costs will come down only if individuals
[21:30] who want more than minimum care have to
[21:33] pay for additional insurance themselves.
[21:36] Kalpers has taken a first step in this
[21:38] direction. Realizing that its members
[21:41] had trouble comparing various health
[21:43] plans, Kalpers required all providers to
[21:46] come up with a standard benefit package.
[21:50] Here at Kaiser, I learned that the
[21:52] Kalpers plan was a little more generous
[21:54] than my own.
[21:56] >> You have V coverage, which means that
[21:57] you pay $5 for your visit when you see
[21:59] the doctor. Um, also, if you need an
[22:02] X-ray or a lab test, there's no charge
[22:04] for that. For your prescriptions, um,
[22:07] you pay $1 in the pharmacy from a Kaiser
[22:09] pharmacy. Um, and basically that's what
[22:12] you're covered for.
[22:13] >> What What kind of benefits do Kalper uh
[22:15] members get? Um, they have the S
[22:18] coverage plan and they I can look it up
[22:20] exactly and tell you
[22:22] the S coverage which is no charge for
[22:24] visits. Um, they pay a dollar for
[22:26] prescriptions as on your plan. They
[22:28] charge for X-ray or for lab tests or for
[22:30] allergy testing.
[22:32] >> Those benefits have proven too expensive
[22:34] and last year they provoked a major
[22:36] battle between Kaiser and Cal perks. In
[22:40] 1991 and '92, Kaiser's premiums jumped a
[22:43] total of nearly 30%. And Kalpers
[22:47] demanded a better price or else. We
[22:50] spent many hundreds of hours trying to
[22:52] convince the Kaiser management to reduce
[22:53] their premium increases, they never
[22:56] reduced them at all. And in return for
[22:58] that, the PERS board, since Kaiser has
[23:01] 40% of our members, uh, decided they
[23:04] would increase their enrollments for a
[23:06] year as a sanction for them not
[23:08] complying with the request. I have to
[23:10] say this is probably the most aggressive
[23:12] thing I ever went through. Jerry Fleming
[23:14] and Dr. Francis Crossen represented
[23:17] Kaiser in the negotiations.
[23:19] Fleming says Kalper's strategy of
[23:21] blocking new enrollments in Kaiser sent
[23:24] a strong message. Clearly, your second
[23:28] largest customer comes to you and say
[23:30] says, "We're very dissatisfied with your
[23:32] rates and and we we go through a process
[23:34] and they decide to punish us by freezing
[23:36] us." Okay, we can't help but notice
[23:38] that. At the same time, we knew we
[23:40] needed to get our cost down and so uh uh
[23:43] we just redoubled our efforts in some
[23:45] sense. This year, Kaiser got reinstated
[23:48] by Kalpers when it came in with a 2%
[23:51] drop in premiums. That was achieved in
[23:54] part by charging patients $5 a visit and
[23:58] raising the co-ayment for drugs from $1
[24:00] to $5. An unpleasant surprise for
[24:03] Kalpers members who had joined Kaiser
[24:06] before the enrollment freeze.
[24:08] >> You know that on August 1st you're going
[24:10] to start paying $5 every time you go for
[24:12] an office visit. That's the new Kalpers
[24:14] contract.
[24:16] >> No, you didn't know that. You didn't
[24:18] know that? Know that
[24:19] >> does that say? That's new to us.
[24:23] >> Is that going to bother you?
[24:25] >> Well, anytime anything goes up in price,
[24:27] it bothers us.
[24:28] >> Yeah, especially if you got families and
[24:30] stuff.
[24:30] >> Kaiser expects the co-ayments to
[24:32] discourage unnecessary visits and
[24:34] therefore cut costs. In addition, Kaiser
[24:37] says Kalpers forced it to become more
[24:40] efficient. For instance, finding new
[24:42] ways to reduce hospital stays. There's a
[24:45] new technique now for taking out your
[24:48] gallbladder
[24:50] which is uh done instead of with a large
[24:53] incision across your abdomen, a very
[24:55] small incision and a and a special uh
[24:58] tube with a laser on it which allows the
[25:01] gallbladder to be taken out um with a
[25:04] smaller incision um and um with a lot
[25:08] less pain. As a consequence, also
[25:11] patients get to go home much more
[25:13] quickly.
[25:14] >> Were you telling me you weren't able to
[25:16] get verbal authorization for this?
[25:18] >> But some costcutting measures draw the
[25:20] eye of physicians who resent it when
[25:22] they feel insurers and bureaucrats are
[25:25] interfering with their medical judgment.
[25:28] >> I mean, this woman has flagrant
[25:30] hypothyroidism and she's got to get this
[25:33] uh iodine treatment.
[25:35] >> Dr. Barbara Newman practices family
[25:37] medicine with a small group in San
[25:39] Francisco. She believes all this
[25:41] emphasis on cost cutting can reduce the
[25:43] quality of care.
[25:45] >> I think you're perverting the whole idea
[25:48] of of healing. A marketplace system
[25:51] would have me trying to do the least I
[25:53] can for this patient and get the most
[25:55] money I can from that patient. Number
[25:58] one, that's not rewarding. It's very
[26:00] alienating. I mean, I'd be terminally
[26:02] depressed if that's how I had to
[26:03] practice medicine. and it just doesn't
[26:05] fit. We're not selling shoes.
[26:07] >> Professor Endho encounters that cost
[26:09] cutting doesn't hurt medicine, it helps.
[26:12] >> I think people should understand when
[26:14] you talk about the lowpric plan. That's
[26:16] not a put down. That's not elipo. That's
[26:19] often the best quality care. Doctors who
[26:22] do it right the first time and don't
[26:23] make mistakes cost a lot less than
[26:26] doctors who are not very good. Enhovven
[26:28] believes that large HMOs like Kaiser,
[26:30] where patients pay a flat yearly rate,
[26:33] encourage efficient care. His theory of
[26:36] managed competition promotes HMOs over
[26:39] the old system, where the more visits
[26:41] the patient makes, the more money the
[26:43] doctor gets.
[26:45] Critics have long contended that HMOs
[26:48] skimp on tests and procedures to stay in
[26:50] the black. But Dr. Bachmann says that's
[26:53] just not so.
[26:54] >> There's no Mr. Kaiser watching over me
[26:57] uh four geneticists that actually make
[26:59] the decision as to what testing is
[27:01] medically appropriate. Uh and then we
[27:03] have to go to our administration and
[27:05] show them why we think that and then if
[27:07] we're able to show them that that it's a
[27:10] test that should be done, no one stops
[27:12] us from doing it.
[27:13] >> There are other objections to the
[27:14] CalPERS model. Author and health
[27:17] consultant Peter Boland alleges that
[27:19] managed competition isn't fair to those
[27:22] not enrolled
[27:23] >> because what we're doing on squeezing
[27:25] price, somebody else is going to get
[27:26] caught with the rest of the bubble. Who?
[27:29] Those who don't have access to these
[27:31] large purchasing groups.
[27:33] >> Is that in fact happening? If Kalpers is
[27:35] bringing down the prices, are other
[27:37] people paying more?
[27:39] >> You and me and everybody else doesn't
[27:40] have access to Kalpers. The only thing I
[27:42] could suggest is that you need to join a
[27:44] purchasing cooperative as well and use
[27:47] that power like we have to hold down
[27:49] prices.
[27:50] >> Professor Enthovven is emphatic. For
[27:52] managed competition to work, everyone
[27:55] should be in a purchasing pool like
[27:57] CalPERS, including the 37 million
[28:00] Americans now uninsured.
[28:03] >> For those people who can afford it, they
[28:05] have to be required to participate to
[28:07] buy coverage. Those people who can't
[28:09] afford it, they have to be subsidized by
[28:11] government so that we get everybody in.
[28:14] >> But Dr. Newman, an activist who favors a
[28:16] Canadian style national health system
[28:19] where the government pays all the bills,
[28:21] thinks that managed competition
[28:23] perpetuates waste. Why do I have to go
[28:26] through an intermediary HMO or Blue
[28:29] Cross with all the administrative
[28:31] expense? I mean, these places employ
[28:33] huge numbers of people. There's a lot of
[28:35] salaries, a lot of paperwork, um a lot
[28:38] of marketing. All that money is wasted
[28:40] that could go just to patient care.
[28:42] >> Unfortunately for advocates of Canadian
[28:45] style health reform, managed competition
[28:48] seems to be winning politically. In
[28:50] California, the Kalpers model is already
[28:53] being copied. The state is bringing
[28:55] together small businesses to bargain
[28:58] collectively for employee health
[29:00] benefits. You know, price and service
[29:03] are the competitive part factors. And
[29:05] >> one recent morning, this new state
[29:07] agency was negotiating with Kaiser in
[29:10] one room. While down the hall, Blue
[29:12] Shield executives were arguing that
[29:15] their health plan should also be offered
[29:17] to employees, the small businesses in
[29:19] the pool.
[29:20] >> Are there other specific diagnostic
[29:22] categories that you try to target for
[29:25] cost management and risk assessment
[29:26] besides pregnant women?
[29:28] >> We think we're the wave of the future.
[29:30] As agency chief, John Remy is the key
[29:33] negotiator for the pool of small
[29:35] businesses. He thinks the concept of
[29:38] purchasing cooperatives like his and
[29:40] Kalpers will fly nationally.
[29:43] >> It has uh the components of a possible
[29:48] political solution. It retains
[29:51] traditional relationships between uh
[29:54] patients and providers. It retains the
[29:57] function of the health benefits
[30:00] industry. Uh it retains free choice
[30:03] which is really critical to uh the
[30:07] electorate and for those reasons I think
[30:09] that it's going to be tried.
[30:11] >> The rising costs of modern medicine make
[30:14] major change inevitable. Managed
[30:16] competition appears to be the reform of
[30:18] choice today. But while various parts of
[30:21] that concept like the purchasing pools
[30:24] have been implemented, no one has ever
[30:26] put all the elements together to find
[30:28] out if the theory works. The test may be
[30:31] soon at hand.
[30:35] [music]
[30:42] We go now to a newsmaker interview with
[30:44] the Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich. He
[30:46] took part today with President Clinton
[30:48] in a special conference on summer jobs.
[30:50] Mr. Secretary, welcome. In the $16
[30:53] billion economic stimulus package that
[30:55] has now stalled in the Senate, how much
[30:57] of that would go to summer jobs?
[30:59] >> Uh, only about a billion dollars. Jim,
[31:03] we're talking about uh a $16 billion
[31:05] stimulus package that has $4 billion of
[31:07] extended unemployment insurance, a lot
[31:10] of uh roads and bridges, child
[31:12] immunization, summer jobs, a variety of
[31:15] things that have to do with uh both
[31:17] rebuilding the foundations of the
[31:18] country, but also in the short term
[31:20] stimulating the economy, uh getting jobs
[31:23] back.
[31:23] >> Now, the summer jobs part of that is how
[31:25] many? 700,000 jobs. 700,000 jobs in
[31:28] addition to 600,000 jobs that the
[31:30] government was planning to support and
[31:33] in addition to a lot of jobs that
[31:36] hopefully the private sector is going to
[31:37] come up with this summer. Uh the
[31:39] government is asking the private sector
[31:41] to uh to come up with an equal number of
[31:43] jobs because it's it's not just a public
[31:46] sector responsibility. Getting those
[31:47] kids uh into structured work
[31:50] environments, giving them some u some
[31:52] pride in what they're doing, getting
[31:53] some some work habits is something that
[31:55] both the public sector and also the
[31:57] private sector need to do.
[31:58] >> The government approach, yours and
[32:00] President Clinton's approach, is it
[32:01] based on the idea that there's a lot of
[32:03] work out there that needs to be done or
[32:05] is it there there are a lot of young
[32:07] people out there who need jobs?
[32:09] >> Well, it's it it's both. uh look at any
[32:11] major city and you look around the city
[32:14] in terms of parks and playgrounds and
[32:16] and uh places for for people to stay uh
[32:20] who uh who have no place to sleep. Uh
[32:22] there's a lot of work to be done.
[32:24] There's no question about that. Uh child
[32:26] care facilities and so on. Uh but a big
[32:29] part of the goal obviously is to give
[32:31] young kids, teenagers who are in urban
[32:34] areas uh who are in deprived areas a
[32:37] structured work environment. get them
[32:38] off the streets, give them a a sense of
[32:40] pride in getting a paycheck. Uh make
[32:42] sure that they show up for work in t
[32:44] time. Uh that there's a little
[32:46] discipline and order in their lives, but
[32:47] also this summer uh give them an
[32:50] educational enrichment, a little uh
[32:52] extra tutoring during the summer so they
[32:54] don't fall back uh and they don't forget
[32:57] by September a lot of what they learned
[32:59] by June. This is a problem particularly
[33:02] in uh some of our urban areas where a
[33:04] lot of kids just simply don't are not
[33:06] exposed to any stimulating environment
[33:08] during the during the summer and they do
[33:10] forget uh during the summer what a lot
[33:12] of what they learned.
[33:13] >> House Minority Leader Michael said today
[33:15] the same thing that many critics of the
[33:17] stimulus package have said before which
[33:19] is okay fine no problem. You want the
[33:21] summer jobs program you have the summer
[33:23] jobs program. It's all that other stuff
[33:25] that is not needed. Is the president uh
[33:28] so anxious to get this summer jobs
[33:31] program that he will make a deal along
[33:32] those lines?
[33:33] >> Uh I remember there there two purposes
[33:37] being served here with regard to the
[33:39] this uh the jobs program. Not only
[33:41] summer jobs but but all the things uh
[33:43] one is to have a down payment on the the
[33:45] long-term investments we have to make as
[33:47] a society. U roads and bridges and all
[33:50] kinds of things that have to be done
[33:51] anyway. we are want to do them a little
[33:53] bit earlier so that number two we can
[33:56] get the economy back on track. Now
[33:57] granted $16 billion is not very much.
[34:00] It's a drop in the bucket in a in a huge
[34:02] economy like ours. But it is at least a
[34:05] small kick in the right direction and uh
[34:07] it's our judgment that the economy is
[34:09] not yet picking up speed. In fact, even
[34:11] in yesterday's news, we saw a drop in in
[34:14] uh consumer spending. Uh and uh we have
[34:17] a a problem with unemployment. are still
[34:19] stuck at 7% or more unemployment for the
[34:22] 16th month in a row.
[34:23] >> But if this program is so small compared
[34:26] to the overall thing, why has it then
[34:27] been so necess why has it become such a
[34:29] huge thing to uh to the president?
[34:32] >> Well, again, it's it's small, but it's
[34:36] it's it's it's necessary. I think that
[34:37] there's there's almost a a psychological
[34:41] gridlock out there right now, Jim. It's
[34:43] not just a political gridlock. It's also
[34:44] you see firms are not hiring. uh they're
[34:48] going on overtime, but they're not
[34:49] actually bringing on new workers.
[34:51] Consumer spending, as I said, is down.
[34:53] Uh there's a there's a fear out there
[34:54] that uh this economy will not really
[34:57] recover in terms of jobs. And if you
[34:59] don't have jobs coming back, you don't
[35:01] really have a long-term recovery. Uh so
[35:03] granted, there is a psychological
[35:05] element. The government is going to do
[35:06] everything it possibly can do to get us
[35:08] back on track. Um if it takes more than
[35:10] $16 billion, uh well, it takes more than
[35:12] 16 billion. But the notion is we've got
[35:14] to at least move forward. We've got to
[35:16] try. And this is what what I find uh and
[35:19] I think other members of the
[35:20] administration find a little bit
[35:21] frustrating because uh Bill Clinton was
[35:23] elected for change to get things moving.
[35:25] Let's experiment. Let's try something.
[35:27] If it not if it's not exactly the right
[35:28] thing, let's try something else. But
[35:30] here we have a situation in which the
[35:32] economy is flat on the jobs front. We've
[35:34] got to at least begin. But even using
[35:37] your term the psychological thing here,
[35:39] uh the critics of this say, well, if
[35:42] that's what you really want to do, if
[35:44] you want to give the economy a kick,
[35:46] then you want to give it a real kick. In
[35:48] other words, with permanent jobs, help
[35:50] the help the private sector and not just
[35:52] go create a bunch of government jobs
[35:54] that are going to eventually run out and
[35:55] not going to do that much. Well,
[35:57] remember part of the simulation program
[35:59] or the jobs recovery program is an
[36:01] investment tax credit uh that would be
[36:04] retroactive right uh right through uh
[36:07] right right now. Uh now again there are
[36:10] opponents who are saying we don't want
[36:11] the investment tax credit. We won't
[36:13] don't want those business incentives.
[36:15] But uh the administration's point of
[36:17] view is that you want to stimulate both
[36:19] public and private investment after all
[36:21] not only in the short term to stimulate
[36:23] the economy but also in the long term. I
[36:25] mean, one of the big problems we've had
[36:27] in this country, if you look at uh
[36:28] whether you're looking at the debts, or
[36:30] you're looking at the disintegration of
[36:31] roads and bridges or our schools, is
[36:33] that we simply are not investing in the
[36:36] future. And uh this is sort of a down
[36:38] payment immediately on a long-term
[36:40] investment. Some people have noticed
[36:42] this appeared in print in fact that uh
[36:45] the president's rhetoric about the
[36:46] economic stimulus uh uh uh uh stifling
[36:51] in the Senate thus far uh has become he
[36:54] his rhetoric is is getting tougher and
[36:56] tougher. Is this about the the Congress
[36:59] comes back on Monday? Do you expect this
[37:01] thing to become a really bloody fight
[37:03] before it's over with? Is it that
[37:04] important to to the president? It it's
[37:07] certainly important to the American
[37:09] public that jobs come back and and I
[37:11] think the president is going to do
[37:12] everything he possibly can do to make
[37:14] sure I mean he he was elected because
[37:16] the economy was so bad. Now we are there
[37:18] are some indicator indicators Jim that
[37:20] the economy is bouncing back in terms of
[37:23] in terms of profits a little bit in
[37:24] terms of productivity but again let me
[37:26] come back to this jobs issue. We are not
[37:29] yet out of the woods on jobs and unless
[37:31] people feel uh more secure. Uh we are
[37:35] not going to be out of the woods on
[37:36] jobs. In fact, large firms are now
[37:38] continuing to slim down. We have 10
[37:40] million people who are unemployed, a
[37:42] couple more million people who are uh
[37:45] working part-time rather be working
[37:46] full-time. We have discouraged workers,
[37:49] another million or more who are too
[37:50] discouraged even to look for work. Uh
[37:53] this is not what the Clinton
[37:55] administration was elected to do.
[37:58] Let's go on to some other things uh that
[38:00] are related to your job as uh secretary
[38:02] of labor. You've said that labor should
[38:04] have a louder voice in government policy
[38:07] on economy.