Meet the Press (NBC) - 2006-11-05 - 2 of 2

Channel: malgent

Transcript

Language: English (original, YouTube automatic captions)

[0:00] that Reynolds was cooked. He was uh by

[0:02] the same pollster uh 15 down. We moved

[0:05] past this. We're now back into what I

[0:07] call all politics is local. The issues

[0:09] in Western New York are jobs, taxes, and

[0:12] social security. And that's what this

[0:13] debate's been on. And that's where uh we

[0:15] will close uh as it goes to the voters

[0:17] on Tuesday.

[0:18] >> But you're in a tight race because of

[0:19] this issue.

[0:21] >> I'm in a tight race because some said

[0:22] that uh a guy putting $2.5 million on my

[0:25] head would make it a close race. I know

[0:27] Ron was certainly pleased to recruit my

[0:29] opponent back for a second round of it.

[0:31] Uh we'll see what it is. I can tell you

[0:33] the polling says that the top issues in

[0:35] our district are jobs, taxes, and social

[0:38] security. But the concern people have is

[0:41] that Foley gave a half million dollars a

[0:43] year committee, spent $200,000 around

[0:44] the country for the Republican

[0:46] candidates, was thinking about resigning

[0:47] himself uh and not running for

[0:49] reelection, and that the Republican

[0:51] leadership were more concerned about

[0:53] holding the Foley seat than they were

[0:55] about this young page. Look, there are

[0:57] two instances. One was the overly

[0:59] friendly emails that uh were out where

[1:02] two reporters from the St. Petersburg

[1:04] Times uh looked at this, didn't find

[1:06] anything. I understand the FBI looked at

[1:08] it, didn't find anything. And the Miami

[1:10] Herald has put an editorial out that

[1:11] they didn't see anything. Didn't even

[1:12] see it newsworthy. And then we see the

[1:15] second set of instant messages and the

[1:17] types of things that ABC released on

[1:19] Friday. In that within two hours, Foley

[1:22] was gone from the Congress. And I think

[1:24] that uh the people in uh Western New

[1:26] York after all of the politics and all

[1:28] the flurry of of uh my opponents and uh

[1:31] uh those types of things came through as

[1:33] if people understood that that had a

[1:34] dramatic change in Western New York once

[1:36] they understood two sets of emails, two

[1:38] different sets of actions.

[1:39] >> Is the Foley scandal playing around the

[1:41] country?

[1:42] >> Well, it's as a part of a culture. Uh

[1:45] what is playing and I think uh Tim is as

[1:47] uh Tom said the economy people want a

[1:50] new direction. They want a minimum wage

[1:51] increase. They want direct negotiations

[1:53] for lower prescription drug prices, part

[1:55] of our agenda. And they also want a

[1:56] Congress that will meet the challenges

[1:58] facing America, both in Iraq, at home,

[2:00] and they want to end partis. But your

[2:02] campaign committee and many of your

[2:03] candidates are emphasizing the Foley

[2:05] scandal, emphasizing the corruption,

[2:07] emphasizing those kinds of issues. Are

[2:09] they playing?

[2:09] >> Well, yeah. I mean, look at Patty

[2:11] Wedling, who has a career in Minnesota

[2:13] uh in fighting for children, an advocate

[2:15] for children, uh has made this an issue

[2:17] because of her career. It is playing.

[2:19] What's playing is a Congress that is out

[2:22] of touch and in touch with the special

[2:24] interest and a Congress that look the

[2:26] Republicans came to power in 1994 to

[2:28] change Washington and Washington changed

[2:30] them. They promised you a balanced

[2:32] budget and they gave you $3 trillion in

[2:34] new debt. They promised you a Congress

[2:36] that would work and clean up the act.

[2:38] And what happened here is you got Tom

[2:39] Delay, Bob Nay, Duke Cunningham, all who

[2:41] have in one way or and also Kurt Weldon

[2:43] all in one way or another in ethical

[2:45] trouble. And third, they promise you a

[2:47] sense of a putting morality quote

[2:49] unquote back into our politics. And

[2:51] they've lost their way in each step of

[2:53] the way on fiscal issues, moral issues,

[2:55] and a Congress that would live by the

[2:56] law.

[2:56] >> Senator Dole, the Democrats are trying

[2:58] very hard to link Republican candidates

[3:01] with George Bush. In the local House

[3:03] race in Virginia, Bush Wolf, he's a

[3:06] local congressman at 06, as if they're

[3:08] running as a team.

[3:09] >> And yet, and yet your candidates

[3:12] >> seem to be distancing themselves from

[3:13] the president. Here's Lincoln Chaffy,

[3:16] Republican candidate. This is a

[3:18] commercial he paid for. Let's watch.

[3:21] >> All the time people tell me, "Link, I

[3:24] really like you, but I have to send Bush

[3:26] a message."

[3:27] >> Mike McGavic in Washington State,

[3:30] Republican. This is what he's saying in

[3:32] his paid commercial.

[3:35] >> And President Bush isn't getting our

[3:37] frustrations. It's time to be decisive.

[3:40] beat the terrorists, partition the

[3:42] country if we have to, and get our

[3:44] troops home in victory.

[3:46] >> These are Republican candidates. And

[3:47] that coupled with this story, a

[3:50] Republican president normally would not

[3:52] need to come to a conservative bastion

[3:55] such as Montana this close to an

[3:56] election, nor to Nevada's second

[3:58] district, which has never voted for a

[4:00] Democrat since he was created in 1982.

[4:02] But Bush is playing defense in red state

[4:05] territory. Why are Republican senatorial

[4:07] candidates running away from the

[4:08] president? And why is he only

[4:10] campaigning in traditional Republican

[4:12] states?

[4:13] >> Tim, once again, let me say that this is

[4:15] a year uh midterm when a president has

[4:18] been reelected. And you look through

[4:20] history, tradition has it that that's a

[4:22] tough tough cycle. Now, obviously, the

[4:24] campaigns are going to determine where

[4:26] it fits best to have the president come

[4:28] in um and where where it's where it's

[4:31] not the best uh idea. I mean, this is

[4:34] this is just uh politics. But why is it

[4:36] just what is there is there an issue

[4:38] that's driving this?

[4:39] >> No.

[4:40] >> No issue.

[4:40] >> Well well actually what what Chuck

[4:42] Schumer is trying to do is to

[4:44] nationalize uh the uh the race. He's

[4:47] trying to he's trying to make it a

[4:48] referendum. And what our candidates have

[4:51] done and what I have certainly done at

[4:52] the senatorial committee is to focus on

[4:55] just what Tom Reynolds has said as as

[4:58] Tip O'Neal used to say, all politics is

[5:00] local. So yeah, our candidates are are

[5:03] comparing their records with their uh

[5:06] does the Iraq war may the Iraq war may I

[5:10] finish this sentence just a moment and

[5:11] I'll go to that. I just want to point

[5:13] out that it is a choice between two

[5:15] people. It's a comparison. Our

[5:17] candidates are talking about their

[5:19] records on important issues that matter

[5:21] in their states and that's what they're

[5:23] focused on. In terms of Iraq, uh people

[5:26] are concerned. You know, uh I'm uh

[5:29] frustrated. Uh you know, obviously the

[5:31] important thing here is to win this war.

[5:34] And so I want to I want to read to you

[5:36] what I think is very effective. This is

[5:38] Mark Kennedy, an ad of Mark.

[5:40] >> We had a we had a debate here with with

[5:42] Miss Clover and Mr. Kennedy, and he and

[5:44] he talked about that extensively.

[5:45] >> Well, here's just quickly though, none

[5:47] of us like war, and we've made some

[5:48] mistakes in Iraq. We're facing an enemy

[5:51] that must be defeated. Leaving Iraq now

[5:53] will create a breeding ground for new

[5:55] attacks on America. That's the harsh

[5:57] reality. My opponent says the answer is

[5:59] diplomacy, but you can't negotiate with

[6:01] people who want to kill you. I'm Mark

[6:03] Kennedy. Securing the peace is a lot

[6:06] harder than wishing for it. I approve

[6:08] this message even though I know it may

[6:10] not be what you want to hear. Now, our

[6:12] candidates are making their own

[6:14] statements in terms of their views from

[6:16] their heart, their conscience, and then

[6:18] they're moving on to other issues.

[6:20] Let me let me I'm going to get to the

[6:22] more to the Iraq war, but I want to

[6:23] focus on the uniqueness of some of these

[6:24] candidates. Senator Schumer, uh here's

[6:27] an article about the candidate for

[6:29] Senate Democrat in Montana. John Tester

[6:32] is a genuine big old farm boy, opposes

[6:35] gay marriage, supports the death

[6:36] penalty, says Hillary Clinton doesn't do

[6:38] much for me, loves guns, hates illegal

[6:41] immigrants, and is the Democratic

[6:43] candidate for Montana's contested US

[6:45] Senate seat. Now, if you're

[6:46] nationalizing the race, is that

[6:48] candidate on board with the national

[6:50] Democratic platform?

[6:51] >> Well, let me say this. On so many

[6:53] issues, John Tester and all of our

[6:55] candidates are on board. And that's

[6:57] because people in Montana and everywhere

[6:59] else want change. And he's on board with

[7:02] raising the minimum wage. He's on board

[7:04] with making middle class families able

[7:06] to pay the costs of college and

[7:08] prescription drugs. He's on board with

[7:10] greater oversight in terms of this

[7:12] administration where it's gone astray in

[7:14] so many different areas. On certain

[7:16] issues, of course, the Democratic Party

[7:18] is a big tent. But yes, on the major

[7:21] issue, do you want change? Montans want

[7:24] change. People in Pennsylvania want

[7:27] change. People in Tennessee want change.

[7:29] And that is the major issue. And on a

[7:31] core basic issues, some core basic

[7:34] issues, the Democratic party is united.

[7:36] >> And guns,

[7:37] >> guns were not united. John Tester's view

[7:39] and my view are worlds apart. And what

[7:41] we've learned, Tim, over the years is

[7:43] this. On certain issues, it's better

[7:45] when the Democratic Party is a big tent.

[7:47] What we ought to be focusing on are two

[7:49] things. The meat and potato issues that

[7:51] affect average voters, where we're much

[7:53] more in sync with the average person

[7:56] across the country than the Republicans,

[7:59] and second, redirection in Iraq.

[8:02] >> The tone of the campaign has been quite

[8:03] striking to a lot of people. Uh the

[8:06] Washington Post reported and Congressman

[8:08] Reynolds, you had confirmed with me that

[8:10] a vast amount of money from the campaign

[8:12] committee was going to be used on quote

[8:13] negative advertising. I want to roll an

[8:16] ad from upstate New York, the 24th

[8:18] district, uh a Democratic candidate paid

[8:21] for by your committee. Let's watch.

[8:25] >> Hi, sexy. You've reached the live

[8:28] one-on-one fantasy line. A phone number

[8:31] to an adult fantasy hotline appeared on

[8:33] Michael Arur's New York City hotel room

[8:35] bill while he was there on official

[8:37] business and the call was charged to

[8:39] Anida County taxpayers. Aruri has denied

[8:42] it, but the facts are there. Who calls a

[8:45] fantasy hotline and then bills

[8:47] taxpayers? Michael Aruri.

[8:50] >> Bad call.

[8:51] >> The National Republican Congressional

[8:52] Committee paid for and is responsible

[8:54] for the content of this message. Now,

[8:55] here are the facts, and they're not

[8:56] disputed by anybody from the local

[8:59] Udica, New York newspaper. What the

[9:01] record shows, a bill shows a call

[9:04] costing 125 to the number 8004578462.

[9:08] Made at 326 p.m. on January 28th, built

[9:11] for one minute. Then the phone records

[9:13] show a call made the next minute using

[9:15] his calling card for 518-4578462.

[9:19] The same number is exactly all right.

[9:21] That number was to the office of the New

[9:23] York State Department of Criminal

[9:25] Criminal Justice Procedures and aid

[9:27] inadvertently dialed the wrong area

[9:29] code. Everyone admits it and yet you put

[9:32] an ad on suggesting that this guy is

[9:34] calling sex hotlines. Is that fair?

[9:37] >> Well, first of all, uh chairman of the

[9:39] committee doesn't know what the IE

[9:40] actually producing when it goes on. We

[9:42] pay for uh second uh that ad is now

[9:45] down.

[9:46] >> You said you're responsible. That's what

[9:47] the banner says. You can take it down if

[9:48] you pay for it.

[9:50] uh the committee paid for it, pulled out

[9:52] fair.

[9:52] >> Is it fair?

[9:53] >> Politics isn't always fair, Tim, as uh

[9:55] both the DC and the NRCC know full well

[9:58] in the contents of both ads as you

[10:00] review all those.

[10:01] >> Exactly. And but Congressman, before you

[10:03] get in, I want to show you an ad that

[10:04] your committee is taking in the

[10:05] Minnesota 6th district. Let's watch

[10:09] >> who would vote against a bill that would

[10:11] put repeat sex offenders behind bars for

[10:14] life. Michelle Bachmann. The Democratic

[10:17] Congressional Campaign Committee is

[10:18] responsible for the content of this

[10:19] advertising.

[10:20] >> Now, this is how the Minnesota Star

[10:22] Tribune reported that a highly deceptive

[10:24] ad by the Democratic Congressional Camp

[10:26] Committee takes one vote out of context

[10:28] to the store congressional candidate

[10:30] Michelle Bachman's record on crime. The

[10:32] 30 secondond ad, which has been airing

[10:33] for a week, invites voters to infer that

[10:35] Bachmann opposed longer sentences for

[10:37] repeat sex offenders when Bachmann

[10:39] actually voted for tougher sentences.

[10:41] Why do you do things like that,

[10:42] >> Tim? First of all, you know what? The

[10:44] Annenberg school studied both committees

[10:46] ads in nonpartisan group and they said

[10:49] the Democratic Congressional Campaign

[10:50] Committee, this is the Annenburgg school

[10:52] said Democratic Congressional Campaign

[10:53] Committee has focused on votes and

[10:55] records and they first focused on

[10:56] personality. Nonpartisan picked and

[10:58] selected the Micah Kuriad that they ran

[11:01] nevered because it was clearly false and

[11:03] we stopped it from going on the air and

[11:05] they knew it when they did it. Those

[11:06] were the votes they're cast. They tried

[11:08] to make something.

[11:08] >> But that's a selective interpretation

[11:10] and you know it,

[11:11] >> right? Absolutely. is not a selective.

[11:13] It's it's based on a vote record, which

[11:14] is what you're responsible for. And if

[11:16] you want to go selective on that, I got

[11:17] a lot more how much more time we got to

[11:19] show commercials all over the country.

[11:20] Tim,

[11:21] >> but let me show you. Let me show you. I

[11:22] got a lot of time here.

[11:23] >> Let me show you. 1988 when young Rahm

[11:25] Emanuel is the political director of the

[11:27] Democratic campaign committee. How to

[11:28] beat a Republican. Rahm Emanuel going on

[11:30] the attack. Now that you've succinctly

[11:32] spelled out your program, you can start

[11:35] dredging up dirt on your opponent. Even

[11:37] if your early venture failed to pan out,

[11:39] keep digging. The untainted Republican

[11:42] has not yet been invented.

[11:43] >> All right.

[11:45] >> That's your political crado.

[11:46] >> No, I I run campaigns and as as uh Tim

[11:50] has Thomas said repeatedly, he was going

[11:52] to do negative advertising. I was making

[11:53] sure our campaigns were fully prepared

[11:55] and I'll stand by the ads we ran.

[11:57] >> Are you concerned about the tone of this

[11:58] campaign? New Jersey voters are saying

[12:01] Mendez and Kaine, forget about it. Both

[12:04] candidates commercials are over the top.

[12:05] >> Well, but let me just say and it

[12:07] reflects what Rahm said. Mendez's ads

[12:10] are talking about Tom Ka's record on

[12:12] Iraq, on stem cell research, on social

[12:15] security. Now, he may say, "Well, I've

[12:17] changed my view or I voted against the

[12:19] stem cell research bills in the Senate,

[12:21] but I'm really state Senate, but I'm

[12:23] really for uh stem cell research." The

[12:25] Menendez ads are are are they've been

[12:28] decrieded by newspapers throughout New

[12:30] Jersey as just being false and personal

[12:32] innuendos. There are exceptions, Tim.

[12:35] Nobody is Simon Pure in this business.

[12:37] But if you look at the vast majority of

[12:39] Democratic ads versus Republican ads,

[12:41] ours have indeed gone after the

[12:44] opponents, but on the stands they've

[12:46] taken, the issues they voted for, while

[12:48] the large percentage of theirs have gone

[12:50] on personal issues like the one.

[12:51] >> You believe the voters are turned off by

[12:53] this negativity.

[12:54] >> I think that uh at this point there's a

[12:57] lot of a lot of negativity out there,

[12:59] but ne nevertheless it does carry

[13:02] messages. uh it's based on research and

[13:05] um I think that you know I think of one

[13:07] particular situation where um and this

[13:11] was a Harold Ford uh ad and it was uh it

[13:14] it has run its course but uh basically

[13:17] what that ad did was to point out uh his

[13:21] views on certain issues and that's the

[13:23] last thing he wanted to do was to talk

[13:25] about his record. Now, there's also an

[13:26] ad paid for by the Republican National

[13:28] Committee which had a blonde white woman

[13:30] winking in the camera saying, "Call me,

[13:32] Harold." And many African-Americans,

[13:34] including former Republican Senator Bill

[13:36] Cohen, said that ad was racist.

[13:38] >> I I did not see it as racist. U I

[13:40] respect those who saw it otherwise. But

[13:42] let me tell you what that ad did. It

[13:45] pointed out his views on on his record

[13:48] that he is uh he's on the wrong side of

[13:51] the abortion issues, that he's protected

[13:53] gay marriage, that he has an anime

[13:58] from the National Rifle Association,

[14:00] that he's a tax increaser. Uh this is

[14:02] one of the biggest uh political frauds

[14:05] in history, his trying to uh to re uh

[14:08] redefine himself. And that ad pointed

[14:11] out particular matters that he didn't

[14:13] want to uh to step up to in terms in

[14:16] terms of the it it pointed out facts

[14:19] there in terms of Harold Ford's true

[14:22] record.

[14:22] >> We have to take a break.

[14:23] >> Is this the filibuster body?

[14:26] >> You guys have had a good shot at it.

[14:27] Both of you.

[14:29] >> We're going to take a quick break and

[14:30] come back. Equal time for everyone. I

[14:31] promise. Right after this.

[14:34] Meet the Press is brought to you by the

[14:37] Boeing Company and by ADM. ADM,

[14:41] resourceful by nature.

[14:48] The world's demand for energy will never

[14:50] stop.

[14:52] Which is why a farmer is growing corn

[14:56] and a farmer is growing soy and why ADM

[14:59] is turning these crops into bofuels.

[15:03] The world's demand for energy will never

[15:06] stop. Which is why ADM will never stop.

[15:10] We're only getting started. ADM,

[15:13] resourceful by nature.

[15:16] I volunteered. I was drafted.

[15:18] >> I enlisted.

[15:19] >> I was nervous. And there I was in Asia,

[15:22] Europe, the Gulf. And I saw things,

[15:24] >> incredible things. And people you never

[15:27] forget.

[15:28] >> I did my job for my country,

[15:30] >> my buddies,

[15:31] >> for total strangers. And I was proud,

[15:34] >> so grateful

[15:35] >> for my family, my freedom,

[15:38] >> for all who served and all who serve. We

[15:42] can never thank them enough.

[15:48] >> Ergonomic desk chairs. I watched their

[15:50] backs.

[15:50] >> $650.

[15:53] Office pet

[15:55] >> slashwatch them.

[15:56] >> $100. Laptops instead of desktops.

[15:59] >> Big ideas don't only come between 9 and

[16:01] 5. $999 each. Running your business your

[16:05] way, no questions asked.

[16:07] >> Nice. Priceless.

[16:12] >> Mastercard Business Card even lets you

[16:13] choose your payment date because you're

[16:15] the boss.

[16:39] The world's first 8-speed automatic

[16:42] transmission. The new LS. Unprecedented.

[16:46] >> Who's faster? Sprint mobile broadband or

[16:49] Singular's Edge?

[16:55] Sprint mobile broadband gives you the

[16:57] power to download five times faster than

[17:00] Singular's Edge.

[17:04] Work faster with Sprint mobile

[17:06] broadband.

[17:07] Get a free mobile broadband card. Visit

[17:10] sprint.com/mobile

[17:11] broadband. Sprint power up.

[17:17] The election two days away. We'll be

[17:18] right back with more from our four

[17:20] campaign committee chairs after the

[17:22] station.

[17:25] Lance Armstrong for Bristol Meer Squib.

[17:27] >> Remember me cancer? You gave me less

[17:30] than a 50/50 chance to live. You made me

[17:33] suffer. My mom, too. But you made me

[17:37] smarter and more determined and a

[17:40] believer in miracles.

[17:42] Remember me, cancer.

[17:44] You made me what I am today.

[17:48] >> Your will, our medicines. Together we

[17:50] can fight the serious diseases. Bristol

[17:52] Meyer Squib. Together we can prevail.

[17:55] >> I'm Brian Williams. Decision 2006 comes

[17:58] down to the wire and we have the

[18:00] election cover. Join us for NBC Nightly

[18:03] News.

[18:05] >> Sunday. Sunday. Candidates in the

[18:07] tightest races are pushing the pedal to

[18:09] the metal and hard ball will be there

[18:11] live on a special night tonight on

[18:13] MSNBC.

[18:15] >> What makes Jack Roberts the best choice

[18:17] for Oregon Supreme Court? Twice elected

[18:20] Oregon Labor Commissioner. He expanded

[18:22] family leave for more parents, made it

[18:24] easier for teenagers to find jobs and

[18:27] stood up for property rights. As a

[18:30] judge, he'll enforce the law and

[18:32] constitution, not his personal beliefs,

[18:35] and will protect the rights of crime

[18:36] victims and their families. Jack Roberts

[18:39] for Supreme Court. Qualified,

[18:42] independent, and fair.

[18:45] >> Spend your election night with the

[18:47] Capital Steps Tuesday, November 7th at

[18:49] the Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall. No

[18:50] one in Washington is safe from these

[18:52] masters of political parody. Election

[18:54] night with the capital steps presented

[18:56] by the Oregon Symphony. Call today or

[18:58] visit oymphony.org for tickets.

[19:01] >> The German word for safe is seeker.

[19:05] The Portuguese word for firewall is moro

[19:07] devo. The Chinese word for password is

[19:10] mima. My company's in 17 countries now

[19:13] and I can say secure in every one of

[19:16] them.

[19:17] Dynamic networking from AT&T identifies

[19:21] security threats before their problems.

[19:23] So Jane's confidence grows right

[19:25] alongside her company. The new AT&T,

[19:28] your world delivered.

[19:31] >> And we are back all week long. John K's

[19:35] comments and attempted joke about

[19:36] President Bush, he says, but it came out

[19:38] as an insult against the troops played

[19:40] out. Did that hurt the Democrats?

[19:42] >> I don't think so. John Kerry did the

[19:43] right thing. He apologized and then he

[19:45] said he's not going to talk about it

[19:47] anymore and I don't think it's going to

[19:48] affect the election at all.

[19:49] >> But it was the wrong thing to say.

[19:51] >> He admitted that and he was a total

[19:53] gentleman, totally on his own. He said,

[19:54] "I'm not going to get out there and keep

[19:56] arguing this even though he wanted to."

[19:58] And I give him give him a lot of credit

[19:59] for that.

[20:00] >> Two Republicans have now put comments in

[20:02] Vanity Fair magazine, Senator Dole, uh,

[20:05] which have caused a little bit of stir.

[20:07] Ken Adelman, lifelong neocon activist,

[20:09] Pentagon insider who served on the

[20:12] Defense Policy Board until 2005, wrote a

[20:15] famous op-ed article in the Washington

[20:16] Post in O2, saying, "I believe

[20:19] demolishing Hussein's military power,

[20:20] liberating Iraq, would be a cakewalk.

[20:23] Now, I just presumed what I considered

[20:25] to be the most competent national

[20:26] security team since Truman was indeed

[20:28] going to be competent. They turned out

[20:29] to be among the most incompetent teams

[20:32] in the post-war era. Not only did each

[20:34] of them individually have enormous

[20:35] flaws, but together they were deadly,

[20:38] dysfunctional. Richard Pearl, chairman

[20:40] of the Pentagon's Defense Policy

[20:42] Advisory Board in the past said if he

[20:45] had his time over, he would not have

[20:47] advocated an invasion of Iraq. I think

[20:49] if I had been delicate,

[20:59] two leading proponents of the war are

[21:00] now saying, "Forget about it.

[21:02] incompetence and you shouldn't have done

[21:04] it.

[21:04] >> Let me let me talk about David from who

[21:06] is one of the people uh uh in the

[21:08] article and his concern about the way it

[21:11] was uh publicized the press release. Uh

[21:14] David from bottom line is the war just

[21:17] as the same um the same as in 203 2003

[21:21] the war was right. We need to win the

[21:23] war and it would be disastrous to lose.

[21:26] That's his bottom line. That's that's

[21:28] what he's concerned about. And you know,

[21:30] it's almost as if the Democrats uh uh

[21:33] you know, it's like they are content

[21:35] with losing because to pull out to

[21:38] withdraw from this war is losing. No

[21:41] question about it.

[21:42] >> The Democrats are content with losing.

[21:44] >> The Democrats appear to be content with

[21:46] losing because they're talking I want to

[21:48] finish. No, you mean there is no Senator

[21:50] Senator W. I'm going to finish. That's a

[21:52] very strong statement. Senator, that's a

[21:53] very strong. I think he deserves the

[21:55] right to respond. I would like to

[21:57] finish. I'll let you back up. Senator,

[21:59] when you make a statement like that to

[22:01] excuse me, when you make a comment like

[22:02] that, I got to give the other side a

[22:04] chance.

[22:04] >> But I do need to explain Senator

[22:07] that you said something that's wrong.

[22:09] Dem Democrats Democrats have provided

[22:12] Wait a second, Senator. I've understand

[22:15] I will not sit I will not sit highly by

[22:17] with an accusation that Democrats are

[22:18] content with losing. We want to win and

[22:20] we want a new direction to Iraq because

[22:22] after three years out,

[22:25] >> this is losing. Hold on. Hold on. Time

[22:27] out. Time out. Forget about it. Reading

[22:29] ground for terrorist.

[22:31] Why don't you take that back, Senator?

[22:33] We'll have differences, but we do not

[22:37] taking over a vacuum. All right, let me

[22:39] let me let me let me let me I'll get to

[22:41] everybody. Let me introduce Vice

[22:42] President Cheny's comments. He said,

[22:44] quote, "The president made clear that

[22:46] his objective is it's victory in Iraq

[22:49] and it's full speed ahead on that basis

[22:51] and that's exactly what we're going to

[22:53] do. It may not be popular with the

[22:54] public. It doesn't matter in the sense

[22:56] that we have to continue the mission or

[22:58] do what we think is right. Uh and that's

[23:00] exactly what we're doing. We're not

[23:02] running for office. We're doing what we

[23:04] think is right. Congressman Reynolds is

[23:06] the vice president saying it's full

[23:08] speed ahead. The public may have their

[23:10] views and now over 60% say the war is

[23:12] not worth it. And in effect, no matter

[23:14] what happens in this midterm elections,

[23:16] the Bush policy in Iraq is going to go

[23:18] forward unchanged.

[23:20] Well, first of all, I think when we look

[23:22] at the war on terror, which is uh part

[23:24] of what uh this is all,

[23:25] >> but I'm asking you about Iraq. Is is

[23:26] that what the vice president is saying

[23:28] that no matter what happens in this

[23:29] election, it's full speed ahead with the

[23:32] Bush policy on Iraq?

[23:33] >> I don't know if that's what he's saying.

[23:34] I've just seen what uh you've outlined.

[23:36] Uh I think that there's no question that

[23:38] uh the Bush administration and the

[23:40] commander-in-chief wants to finish the

[23:41] job. And uh while uh we certainly know

[23:44] the Democrats don't have unonymity on

[23:46] the war either as Senator Schumer talked

[23:48] about other areas that there's

[23:49] disagreement, uh there's part of the uh

[23:52] Democratic party that wants to cut and

[23:54] run. There's others that uh follow the

[23:56] Bush uh agenda. There's others that want

[23:58] to redirect the war. Uh but the reality

[24:00] is we are either going to finish the job

[24:02] or we're going to cut and run.

[24:04] >> Let me say, Tim, that is not Let me say

[24:06] a couple of things first. First, you

[24:08] know, the Republican response is what my

[24:11] good friend Elizabeth said. It's sort of

[24:12] kneecapping, name calling.

[24:14] >> It works. It has worked in the past when

[24:17] people are happy with the policy. Right

[24:19] now, the American people, as you said,

[24:21] not just Democrats, independents,

[24:23] Republicans, are very unhappy what's

[24:25] happening in Iraq. You had Pearl over

[24:28] there. The only people who seem to be

[24:30] thinking it's going well are the

[24:32] president and his codery of adviserss.

[24:34] Now, we Democrats are unified on Iraq.

[24:36] We had in the Senate the Reed Levven

[24:38] resolution which calls for this. First,

[24:42] >> stop policing a civil war. Iraq has

[24:44] devolved into a civil war between

[24:46] Shiites and Sunnis. That's not what we

[24:48] bargain for. Second, make 2007 a year of

[24:52] transition where we redeploy our troops,

[24:54] pulling a good number of them out of

[24:56] harm's way. Some would stay in Iraq,

[24:58] some would be nearby, and focus on four

[25:01] things.

[25:02] >> Is this a Is this a Democratic plan?

[25:04] >> Yes, it is. It is it is four things. It

[25:07] is focus on counterterrorism, force

[25:10] protection, logistics, and training.

[25:14] That is our plan. That is what we'll

[25:16] push to do should we get the power in

[25:18] the Senate. And 39 of the 44 Democrats

[25:21] in the Senate voted for it.

[25:22] >> Mr. Let me ask you a question. If in

[25:24] fact the Democrats take control of the

[25:26] House, what will happen on Iraq? Will it

[25:30] be full speed ahead or will the

[25:31] Democrats try to cut funding off of the

[25:33] war?

[25:34] >> No. There will be a demand for

[25:35] accountability and oversight. One of the

[25:37] things, let me say one thing from that

[25:39] comment.

[25:41] Elizabeth, Elizabeth,

[25:43] >> just wait one second. Just let me get a

[25:44] chance to get a word in. We've had

[25:47] slogans and a long list of slogans from

[25:49] mission accomplished to the terrorists

[25:50] are in the last throws to the fact is

[25:53] that uh we've turned the corner to now

[25:55] in fact that we are victorious. And the

[25:57] fact is Iraq needs new direction and the

[25:59] Democrats in Congress are going to be

[26:00] clear that we need a policy that would

[26:02] be very clear from that's what I'm

[26:05] trying to find out. What is here? Here

[26:06] here's what the chairman Here's what the

[26:08] chairman of your party said. Howard

[26:09] Dean, you're your very good friend. I

[26:10] know. He said, quote, "We will promise

[26:13] you that if you elect a majority in the

[26:15] House and the Senate, we will not permit

[26:18] Iran to be a nuclear power. We will make

[26:20] a deal with China to get nuclear weapons

[26:23] out of North Korea. We will catch

[26:25] capture Osama bin Laden or kill him. The

[26:27] Democrats can promise that if they take

[26:30] control of Congress

[26:31] >> here you I'm going to focus on the what

[26:32] you said.

[26:33] >> I'm asking you a serious question. The

[26:34] party chairman said you can do all those

[26:36] things. Can you?

[26:37] >> We're going to Here's what we're going

[26:38] to do. We're not going to divert our

[26:40] resources from focusing on capturing

[26:42] Osama bin Laden 5 years after 9/11. We

[26:45] are going to work with our allies on

[26:46] making sure that North Korea when we

[26:47] issue a red line doesn't cross it

[26:48] without any sense of consequences. And

[26:51] we are going to work also in making sure

[26:52] that Iran does not develop a nuclear

[26:54] weapon. But let me say one thing clear

[26:55] about the principles we're going to have

[26:57] whether Senator Biden's idea on Iraq,

[26:59] which I think is a strong idea, Senator

[27:00] Leven's program, Congressman Jack Murtha

[27:02] and Congressman Ike Skelton. There are

[27:04] five basic principles that hold

[27:05] Democrats together on our approach to

[27:07] Iraq. First, regional cooperation.

[27:11] Second, reconciliation among the

[27:13] parties. Third, reconstruction uh of the

[27:16] economy. Fourth, responsibility for uh

[27:20] results and fifth is redeployment from

[27:23] Iraq. Those are the five principles. All

[27:25] Democrats say we have to change the

[27:26] policy. These guys have the Republicans

[27:28] and the president and I'll say this, the

[27:30] president's got what he needed for this

[27:31] war totally from Congress except for the

[27:34] one thing that the Republicans have

[27:35] denied him and that's oversight and

[27:37] accountability.

[27:37] >> Would the Democrats consider cutting off

[27:39] funding for the war?

[27:40] >> No, we're not going to hurt our troops

[27:41] at that. We're going to make sure we

[27:42] have a new policy and when the Baker and

[27:44] when the Baker and Lee Hamilton approach

[27:46] comes, our approach will not be what the

[27:48] vice president said was steam full steam

[27:50] ahead. We're going to listen to that

[27:51] approach and work in a bipartisan

[27:52] fashion to solve the worst national

[27:54] security challenge America's faced in

[27:56] over two generations. France were to

[27:58] take over the Congress, the chairman of

[28:00] the House Ways and Means Committee has

[28:02] said that he would uh cut the funding

[28:04] for the war.

[28:05] >> He didn't say he would. He would

[28:06] consider

[28:07] >> Well, that's a Congressman Govern of

[28:10] Massachusetts has a resolution with 18.

[28:12] But let me let me ask you let me ask you

[28:15] let me ask you about a comment that

[28:16] President Bush made. President Bush said

[28:18] that both the vice president and the

[28:20] secretary of defense are doing fantastic

[28:23] jobs quote unquote and will be there

[28:25] until the end of his term.

[28:27] >> Tomorrow a joint editorial from the Army

[28:30] Times, the Air Force Times, the Navy

[28:32] Times, the Marine Corps Times. This is

[28:34] what they say. All along Rumsfeld has

[28:37] assured us that things are well in hand.

[28:39] Now, the president says he'll stick with

[28:40] Rumsfeld for the balance of his term in

[28:42] the White House. This is a mistake. When

[28:44] the nation's current military leaders

[28:46] start to break publicly with their

[28:47] defense secretary, then it's clear he is

[28:49] losing control of the institution he

[28:50] ostensibly leads. Rumsfeld has lost

[28:53] credibility with the uniform leadership,

[28:55] with the troops, with Congress, with the

[28:56] public at large. His strategy has

[28:58] failed. His ability to lead is

[28:59] compromised. And although the blame for

[29:01] our failure in Iraq uh rests with the

[29:03] secretary, it will be the troops who

[29:04] bear its brunt. This is not about the

[29:06] midterm elections. Regardless of which

[29:08] party wins November 7th, the time has

[29:10] come, Mr. President, to face the hard,

[29:12] bruising truth. Donald Rumsfeld must go.

[29:14] During the meet the press debates on

[29:16] this program, Senator Dole. Mike DeWine,

[29:18] Republican Ohio, said Secretary

[29:21] Rumsfeld, no confidence. Michael Steele,

[29:23] who you were praising moments ago,

[29:25] Republican candidate for Maryland, said

[29:28] Rumsfeld must go. Would it be helpful in

[29:31] order to pull the country together after

[29:33] these elections that there be a change

[29:35] at the head of the Pentagon? You

[29:36] >> know, first of all, let me say that our

[29:38] candidates all speak from their uh uh

[29:41] their own views. Uh they we have no set

[29:44] of talking points for our candidates.

[29:46] They speak their minds. Uh they're

[29:48] independent. They're not rubber stamps.

[29:50] Uh whether it's Mike Dwine or whether

[29:52] it's Mike McGavic or whether it's

[29:54] Michael Steel or whoever else it might

[29:55] be. So that rubber stamp I want to uh

[29:58] shoot down right now.

[29:59] >> I never used the word but I am.

[30:01] >> You didn't but my friends

[30:03] did. Would it be helpful for the country

[30:05] after these elections

[30:06] >> stand by Donald Rumsfeld? He and the

[30:09] president he serves at the at the

[30:10] pleasure of the president.

[30:12] >> Do you believe it would be helpful for a

[30:14] change at the top of the Pentagon?

[30:15] >> First of all the Army Times editorial is

[30:18] written by its gazette owned newspaper

[30:20] which is well positioned in other

[30:22] editorial comment relative to uh the

[30:24] war. And so the editorial writers may be

[30:27] coming from Virginia versus uh from the

[30:29] military particularly because it's owned

[30:30] by Guanette. Second, uh Donald Runsfeld

[30:34] serves at the pleasure of the president.

[30:36] And this isn't about Donald Runsfeld.

[30:37] It's about the aspect of the war on

[30:39] terror. And it's interesting to listen

[30:41] to my colleague Rammy Emanuel talk about

[30:43] some sort of unity in the house. They

[30:45] have struggled for months in order to

[30:47] put together a position on Iraq. They

[30:49] could not. And therefore they abandoned

[30:51] it. There's no position following Jack

[30:52] Murtha. There's no position following

[30:54] Nancy Pelosi. There's no position

[30:56] following Ike Skelton. There are no

[30:58] positions publicly by the House

[31:01] Democrats on a direction of Iraq.

[31:03] >> Leadership of the House endorsed the

[31:06] position that I just talked about that

[31:08] 39 of the 44 Democrats voted for,

[31:11] calling 2007 a year of transition. It

[31:13] was signed by you've talked about, but I

[31:16] want to raise one other issue with the

[31:17] Democrats because it's on the minds of

[31:18] some voters and that is what they'll do

[31:20] if they win. until May. John Conurs, who

[31:23] would become chairman of the judiciary

[31:24] committee, had this on his website. He

[31:27] said, "Stand with Congressman Conurs.

[31:29] Demand that investigation of

[31:30] administration abuses of power. Make

[31:32] recommendations regarding grounds for

[31:34] possible impeachment." Is that what it's

[31:36] going to be? The Democrats get the gavl,

[31:38] investigate.

[31:39] >> Absolutely not. We're going to we're

[31:40] going to pass some increase in the

[31:41] minimum wage, direct negotiations for

[31:43] lower prescription drug prices, the 911

[31:45] commission recommendations America safe,

[31:47] redirect the 12 billion given to big oil

[31:50] to energy and

[31:50] >> no investigations into Iraq.

[31:52] >> We're going to have oversight because

[31:54] that's what one of the problems with

[31:55] with the Congress when it came to the

[31:57] audit the inspector general you fired.

[31:59] We're going to have hearings and

[32:00] oversight. It will not lead to it would

[32:02] not take on impeachment. We will not

[32:04] impeachment off the table.

[32:05] >> Will not happen. Let me just say and say

[32:07] that but totally off the table. Tim, let

[32:09] me say one other thing. The Army Times

[32:11] joined the 12 generals who said Rumsel

[32:12] should go and I can't believe of all the

[32:15] people you would pick about what is to

[32:16] give Don Rumsfeld issues that we've not

[32:18] had a chance to to address. Everybody's

[32:21] had equal time. Believe me, we've timed

[32:22] this out. We have the economy

[32:27] talking about

[32:27] >> I know. Here's what we have to do before

[32:29] we go though in all honesty. Who and

[32:32] whoever is the farthest whoever is the

[32:34] Whoever is the most strong who's ever

[32:36] the most strong $100 for the Boys and

[32:38] Girls Club of Washington DC. You got it.

[32:40] >> How many seats for the Republicans win?

[32:42] >> I won't count the seats, but I believe

[32:43] we have a great opportunity to hold the

[32:45] House by turning the vote out.

[32:46] >> That's your prediction. Will you win the

[32:48] House?

[32:48] >> I'd rather be us than them.

[32:49] >> Will you win the House for the Boys and

[32:51] Girls Club?

[32:52] >> There's I'm going to help the Boys and

[32:53] Girls Club regardless because winning a

[32:55] Democratic majority would be a

[32:56] >> maintain the majority in the United

[32:58] States Senate.

[32:59] >> She's on the line. Will you win? We're

[33:00] right on the edge of taking back the

[33:02] Senate. We're going to be happy

[33:03] Wednesday morning.

[33:04] >> How many seats do you have to that gain

[33:06] to take care of control of the Senate?

[33:08] >> Six.

[33:08] >> Six. Right.

[33:09] >> Right.

[33:09] >> See how Schumer said six. Let me show

[33:11] you. 39 years ago, the high school

[33:14] program, it's academic. Let's watch.

[33:16] Let's watch.

[33:18] >> And now, let's introduce our teams in

[33:20] the semi-final match from Brooklyn, New

[33:23] York. James Madison High School. Janet

[33:25] Schwarz, Captain Chuck Schumer, and

[33:27] Barry Lavine. Now wait, listen. The

[33:30] moderator was listen to this question

[33:32] and this answer. Here we go.

[33:35] >> What number is the factorial of

[33:37] >> six?

[33:40] >> Six.

[33:42] >> You know who is the moderator of that?

[33:44] >> Ki Roberts.

[33:46] >> As it should be.

[33:49] >> So you'll say maybe. You say definite.

[33:51] You say definite. You say maybe.

[33:54] >> Republicans seem more confident.

[33:56] >> Oh no. We just You don't want to give it

[33:58] a a jinx.

[34:00] >> Hey,

[34:00] >> and uh we're feeling we're feeling good,

[34:02] Tim. Hey, Tim, I want to say one thing.

[34:04] If you would have told us

[34:06] >> 2005 that we're going to pick up a whole

[34:08] lot of seats,

[34:09] >> I would have said never. We're doing

[34:11] great.

[34:12] >> Sid luck said the old Chicago Bear never

[34:15] spike the ball in the 20 yard line.

[34:16] >> We don't talk about Chicago Bears

[34:19] watching Tuesday. We'll be right back.

[34:20] Go Bills.

[34:22] >> All right, team.

[34:26] The Philips HD flat TV with Ambulite is

[34:29] the only flat TV with the power to

[34:32] transform a mood

[34:34] at the touch of a button.

[34:45] Simplicity is a button that transforms

[34:48] television.

[34:57] At UBS, financial solutions come from

[35:00] listening very carefully to what our

[35:02] clients say,

[35:04] but even more carefully to what they

[35:07] don't say.

[35:10] You could call it the commitment to

[35:12] understand.

[35:16] We just call it you and us.

[35:20] You and us. UBS,

[35:24] >> you okay?

[35:25] I'm working like a dog.

[35:28] >> I run down to the print department, scan

[35:29] color documents, make color prints, run

[35:32] back, get approvals, run up to five and

[35:33] have to fax stuff all over the place.

[35:35] But I think I'm getting noticed. Is it

[35:37] rough by you two?

[35:38] >> Not that rough. What do you mean?

[35:40] There's a color multi-function machine

[35:42] on my floor. I scan, copy, print, and

[35:44] fax and color from there. There's

[35:46] nothing to it.

[35:48] >> Don't do this to me.

[35:50] >> Xerox color. It makes business sense.

[35:52] >> Come on. Come on.

[35:58] >> Last year, Norfolk Southern ended

[36:00] shipping partners took hundreds of

[36:01] thousands of freight loads off the

[36:03] highway.

[36:08] In fact, they've invested millions to

[36:11] convert even more traffic in the coming

[36:12] years. So, it's easy to see how the

[36:15] economy won't be the only thing that

[36:17] benefits.

[36:19] Norfolk Southern, the future of

[36:21] transportation.

[36:24] >> For over a hundred years, Merc

[36:26] scientists have produced vaccines and

[36:28] medicines that have improved the quality

[36:30] of life for millions of patients. And

[36:32] that record of achievement continues

[36:34] today as our 8,000 scientists conduct

[36:36] exciting new research to develop

[36:39] medicines that prevent and treat

[36:40] diseases like diabetes, Alzheimer's, and

[36:43] cancer. Here at Merc, we have always

[36:46] believed that the process of discovering

[36:48] new medicines has to include rigorous

[36:50] scientific research conducted under high

[36:53] standards of ethical behavior.

[36:56] Meeting those high standards is at the

[36:58] heart of who we are and how we do

[37:00] business. And those principles aren't

[37:02] new. They are the same ones that have

[37:04] guided our scientists and people every

[37:06] day since George MK founded our company

[37:09] in 1891. and why all of us here continue

[37:12] to proudly say Merc is where patients

[37:14] come first, where you come first.

[37:24] Stay with NBC News, MSNBC, and MSNBC.com

[37:27] for extensive election coverage. This

[37:29] Tuesday, network coverage begins with

[37:30] Brian Williams on the NBC Nightly News

[37:32] continues with The Decision 2006 special

[37:35] report 10 p.m. Eastern. Of course, full

[37:37] coverage all day and night on MSNBC and

[37:40] MSNBC.com.

[37:42] That's all for today. We back next week

[37:44] with a full review of what happened on

[37:46] the midterm election day of 2006. If

[37:49] it's Sunday, it's Meet the Press.

[37:51] >> Yeah, that's

[37:54] >> for each of us, there's a moment of

[37:56] discovery. We see that all of life is

[37:59] elemental.

[38:01] And as we marvel at element bonding with

[38:03] element, we soon realize that when you

[38:06] add the human element to the equation,

[38:08] the chemistry changes. We find a way of

[38:11] seeing that gives us a way of touching

[38:14] issues, ambitions, lives, the human

[38:18] element. Nothing is more fundamental,

[38:21] nothing more elemental.

[38:38] With fewer emissions than any engine of

[38:40] its kind, the GE NX jet engine is

[38:42] powering a fresh new way of looking at

[38:44] technology that even nature could

[38:46] approve of. Another product of pure eco

[38:48] imagination from GE Aviation. GE

[38:52] imagination at work.

[38:53] >> No, I'm not going to go through it line

[38:55] by line, but have you ever actually

[38:57] looked at this thing? I mean, account

[39:00] research fee $32. Deposit verification

[39:04] $12. Are these even actual terms? It's

[39:07] like someone spent their entire day

[39:09] thinking of ways to nickel and dimes.

[39:24] >> Way back then, we had the horse and

[39:26] carriage. There was no television then.

[39:28] People listen to radio.

[39:29] >> Get the clothes out, wash them on the

[39:31] washboard,

[39:32] >> and then the calculates got smaller and

[39:33] smaller.

[39:34] >> 45 would drop and it would play.

[39:36] >> If you held the rabbit ears in exactly

[39:37] the right position,

[39:41] >> I used to have to parallel park myself.

[40:04] Introducing the new HP Blade system

[40:06] C-Class with thermal logic, virtual

[40:08] connect, and insight control powered by

[40:10] dualcore Intel Xeon processors. Now you

[40:13] can contain the chaos and set it free to

[40:16] drive your business.

[40:23] >> I volunteered. I was drafted.

[40:25] >> I enlisted.

[40:26] >> I was nervous.

[40:27] >> And there I was in Asia, Europe,

[40:29] >> the Gulf. And I saw things,

[40:32] >> incredible things,

[40:33] >> and people you never forget.

[40:35] >> I did my job,

[40:36] >> for my country,

[40:37] >> my buddies,

[40:38] >> for total strangers,

[40:39] >> and I was proud,

[40:41] >> so grateful

[40:42] >> for my family, my freedom,

[40:45] >> for all who served and all who serve. We

[40:49] can never thank them enough.

[41:08] From Meet the Press, the Senate debate

[41:10] series. Tim Russard moderates the

[41:11] hottest debates of 2006. Pennsylvania,

[41:14] Virginia, Ohio, Missouri, Minnesota,

[41:17] Maryland. Now they're all in one place.

[41:20] Log on to mtp.msnbc.com

[41:22] for encore presentations. The Senate

[41:24] debate series now all online from Meet

[41:27] the Press.

[41:29] Oregon's waited a long time for results

[41:31] from Ted Kulingosski. But Ted's time is

[41:34] up. Newspapers call Kulingowski a

[41:37] no-show governor who has not stepped up

[41:39] to lead. Ron Saxton will change Oregon

[41:42] with education reform, more money into

[41:44] classrooms, a focus on results. He'll

[41:46] hold the line on taxes, cut waste,

[41:49] control spending with leadership, not

[41:51] partisanship. Kulangoski won't make the

[41:54] changes Oregon needs, but you can. Ron

[41:56] Saxton for governor.

[41:58] >> Get more out of your money. The Sunrise

[42:01] Consumer Alert every morning at 5:45 on

[42:04] News Channel 8, where the news comes

[42:06] first.

[42:08] >> An important message from Paul Evans. In

[42:11] just a few days, I'll be directing

[42:12] combat aircraft over Afghanistan with my

[42:14] Air National Guard unit. I'll be there

[42:17] on election day, fighting terrorism,

[42:20] defending freedom. But if I'm fortunate

[42:22] enough to be elected to the Oregon

[42:23] Senate, I'll be back in January, ready

[42:26] to work. I know my family and 800

[42:29] volunteers will keep my campaign going

[42:30] while I'm on active duty because we're

[42:32] all working hard to bring real change to

[42:34] Salem. This is Paul Evans, and I'd

[42:37] appreciate your vote. Tracking Down a

[42:39] Child Predator. Monday at 11.

[42:43] >> The following program is a paid

[42:44] commercial message for the Donald Trump

[42:46] Way to Wealth Seminars.

[42:55] >> Hello, I'm Anne Howard. We're talking to

[42:58] Donald Trump today, who is the very

[43:00] definition of the American success story

[43:02] with interest in real estate.

[43:04] >> Write only $33 each per month for 12

[43:06] months. Subscribe to one, two, or all

[43:09] three. It's your choice. Get ready to

[43:11] save. Call 1800 Comcast by Tuesday for

[43:14] one of our best offers ever.

[43:16] >> Who unknowingly paid to get the homeless

[43:18] in the suburbs? Tonight at 11.