Claude Mythos 5 + Fable 5 Are Here And The Numbers Are INSANE
Channel: Chase AI
Uploaded:
Duration: PT608S
Read a transcript preview of “Claude Mythos 5 + Fable 5 Are Here And The Numbers Are INSANE” from Chase AI, uploaded on 2026-06-09.
Transcript preview
Language: English (original, YouTube automatic captions)
[0:00] Claude Mythos is finally here. Well,
[0:03] sort of. What most of us are actually
[0:05] going to be getting today is Claude
[0:06] Fable 5. Although, Anthropic is
[0:09] releasing Claude Mythos 5 again for a
[0:12] small subset of users. Now, if that's a
[0:14] little confusing, let me explain. So,
[0:16] Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos class model
[0:19] that is now available for general use.
[0:21] So, just like we have the Sonnet set of
[0:23] models and the Opus set, we now have the
[0:25] Mythos class and underneath that
[0:27] umbrella is Claude Fable 5. This is
[0:29] available right now. Fable 5 is the best
[0:31] model they have ever released. This is
[0:34] better than what we've seen with Opus
[0:35] 4.8. But, how does it compare to Mythos?
[0:38] Well, essentially, Fable 5 is Mythos
[0:41] with significant guardrails. And that's
[0:44] coming from the idea that Mythos is so
[0:47] powerful that if they gave it to us
[0:49] without these guardrails, there would be
[0:50] some significant cybersecurity risks.
[0:52] And so, what they have done instead is
[0:54] they have launched the model with
[0:55] safeguards. That means queries on some
[0:56] topics, hint things related to
[0:58] cybersecurity, will instead receive a
[1:01] response from our next most capable
[1:02] model, Claude Opus 4.8. So, if they
[1:06] think Fable 5 can handle it and it's not
[1:08] going to be a risk, it's going to go to
[1:10] the Mythos class. If they think this is
[1:12] kind of in a gray area, you're going to
[1:13] get pushed to Claude Opus 4.8. As for
[1:15] how often that happens, well, they say
[1:16] it happens in less than 5% of sessions.
[1:19] So, depending on the sort of domain
[1:20] you're using, you might not run into
[1:21] this issue at all.