ABC Evening News open - 1977-07-11
Channel: malgent
Transcript
Language: English (original, YouTube automatic captions)
[0:06] This is the ABC Evening News with Harry
[0:09] Reezner and Barbara Walters. Good
[0:12] evening. Our top stories. General Motors
[0:14] predicts no 1978 cars unless clean air
[0:17] standards change. The postal service
[0:19] moves ahead toward 13 cent first class
[0:21] mail for individuals, 16 cents for
[0:23] business. Also, transportation secretary
[0:26] Brock Adams says no oil will flow in
[0:28] Alaska until he's sure it's safe. And a
[0:31] sixth name has entered the sweep stakes
[0:33] for FBI director. I'm Howard K. Smith
[0:36] and tonight I'll have a comment on will
[0:38] the Soviet Union survive till 1985.
[0:42] >> There's the possibility tonight of a
[0:44] head-on collision between Congress and
[0:46] the auto industry. General Motors, for
[0:48] one, says unless the clean air law is
[0:50] changed and quickly, it's possible there
[0:52] may be no 1978 model GM cars. We have a
[0:55] report from Greg Dobs in Detroit.
[0:58] >> The key to the problem is this. In 1970,
[1:01] Congress told automakers to clean up
[1:03] auto exhaust. The deadline under that
[1:05] law applying to 1978 models. The
[1:08] industry said back then that
[1:09] technologically the deadline came too
[1:11] soon. And now with 78 models due to be
[1:13] built within a month, the industry says
[1:15] it still can't obey that law.
[1:18] >> Uh we can't build or ship automobiles
[1:21] unless they comply with the law and uh
[1:23] and we're not prepared to do that.
[1:25] >> That was the president of General Motors
[1:27] saying in effect, "These 1977 cars may
[1:30] be among the last GM turns out if
[1:32] Congress doesn't soon soften its clean
[1:34] air standards." The other US automakers
[1:36] say they share his fear. The urgency
[1:39] comes with the timing. Congress could go
[1:41] into its traditional summer recess early
[1:43] next month without giving the industry
[1:45] new clean air standards to build by. And
[1:47] then based on anything we know today,
[1:50] there's no alternative except to close
[1:52] our plants, lay our people off. And of
[1:54] course, we think that's absolutely
[1:56] unnecessary and uh and it shouldn't
[1:59] happen and hopefully it won't.
[2:01] It appears right now that the automakers
[2:03] are holding a gun to Congress's head and
[2:05] that it may go off and then there would
[2:07] be massive plant closings across the US
[2:09] and the nation's economy may be
[2:11] seriously disrupted.
[2:13] Greg Dobs, ABC News, Detroit.
[2:16] >> A spokesman for Ford acknowledged that
[2:18] the situation presents a major problem
[2:20] for most 1978 models. Although Ford will
[2:22] make some new small cars and simply
[2:24] label them 77s to get around the hangup.
[2:27] A Chrysler official wouldn't predict how
[2:29] production might be affected and said,
[2:31] "We'll cross that bridge when we come to
[2:32] it." In Congress, the bridge they're
[2:34] trying to achieve is between differing
[2:36] Senate and House versions of the Clean
[2:38] Air Act. Senator Gary Hart of Colorado
[2:40] was asked how sympathetic he is to the
[2:42] General Motors position.
[2:44] >> Very sympathetic, and I was sympathetic
[2:46] a year ago, and uh that's why we we had
[2:48] that bill ready to go. What I don't
[2:49] understand is how on the one hand the
[2:52] spokesman for the industry can claim
[2:53] that Congress is dragging its feet and
[2:56] then have participated in an effort to
[2:58] kill a bill which did in fact give them
[2:59] relief a year ago.
[3:02] In Alaska, pipeline officials are hoping
[3:04] they can resume pumping oil soon
[3:06] bypassing the pumping station that blew
[3:08] up last Friday. But in Washington today,
[3:10] Transportation Secretary Brock Adams
[3:12] said not a single drop will flow until
[3:14] he's convinced that the bypass operation
[3:16] is 100% safe. Steven Gear has the latest
[3:19] from Alaska. Oil is likely to be flowing
[3:21] through this pipeline again in the very
[3:23] near future unless the government safety
[3:26] concerns expressed by Secretary Adams
[3:28] cause a delay. Although Friday's
[3:31] explosion and fire destroyed the pump
[3:33] building and all its equipment at
[3:34] pumping station number eight, the
[3:36] pipeline itself apparently was not
[3:38] damaged, nor was there damage to the
[3:40] manifold building through which the
[3:42] pipeline runs. This is only one of 12
[3:45] pumping stations on the 800m pipeline.
[3:48] And officials of Alaska, the pipeline
[3:50] company, believe the oil flow can be
[3:52] resumed simply by bypassing the
[3:54] destroyed pumping equipment. Yesterday,
[3:56] Alaska officials said the flow can
[3:58] probably be resumed safely this week.
[4:01] Today, we asked Alaska spokesman Larry
[4:03] Carpenter if there is reason for the
[4:05] safety concern voiced by Secretary
[4:07] Adams.
[4:08] >> Of course, there is. And there is in in
[4:10] in terms of other uh federal and state
[4:13] agencies too. All will be concerned
[4:15] about the safety as will Alaska. And we
[4:19] can assure you that we'll move uh uh as
[4:22] a pipeline company with the utmost
[4:25] caution. While deploring the tragedy
[4:27] that killed one worker and injured five
[4:29] others, company officials emphasized
[4:31] that environmental damage was minimal.
[4:33] The explosion occurred during the
[4:35] routine removal of a pump filter. oil
[4:37] sprayed out from a valve that should
[4:39] have been closed. And Aliesa contends
[4:41] there was no evident equipment failure,
[4:43] but that there was human error. This is
[4:46] very much what the pump building looked
[4:47] like before the disaster. These pictures
[4:50] were taken by ABC News on June 19th at
[4:52] pumping station number one at Prudo Bay,
[4:55] but the equipment is almost identical.
[4:57] To avoid a repetition of human error,
[4:59] the company today is rebriefing all pump
[5:01] station employees on safety procedures.
[5:04] But spokesman Carpenter