CBS Evening News Online Edition - 2005-12-23
Channel: malgent
Transcript
Language: English (original, YouTube automatic captions)
[0:00] Hello, I'm Bob Schaefer and welcome to
[0:02] the CBS Evening News online edition.
[0:04] Just ahead, the administration moves to
[0:06] reduce the size of the American military
[0:09] force in Iraq. Is this the first step in
[0:12] a major draw down? David Martin will
[0:14] have the story. Also, who gave President
[0:17] Bush the authority to spy on American
[0:19] citizens without a warrant? He says
[0:22] Congress, a former senator, says no, we
[0:24] didn't. And tis the season, the flu
[0:27] season. Just how bad is it going to be?
[0:30] It's all starting now on the CBS Evening
[0:33] News online edition.
[0:36] The announcement came from the Secretary
[0:38] of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. The American
[0:41] military force in Iraq, as expected, is
[0:43] being reduced, not by much for now, but
[0:47] everything about the announcement today,
[0:49] including where it was announced, the
[0:51] one-time insurgent stronghold of
[0:53] Fallujah, suggests the military feels
[0:56] confident now that there can be
[0:58] additional withdrawals next year. Our
[1:01] first report tonight comes from David
[1:02] Martin at the Pentagon.
[1:05] Two combat brigades, a total of 7,000
[1:08] troops, have had their orders to Iraq
[1:10] canled. The first modest step in a plan
[1:12] to turn over fighting to the Iraqis and
[1:15] cut the number of American troops to
[1:17] 100,000 by next fall's US congressional
[1:19] elections. It was announced by Defense
[1:22] Secretary Rumsfeld during a Christmas
[1:24] visit to Iraq. The Iraqi security forces
[1:27] are increasingly capable
[1:29] and we are we are continuously passing
[1:32] off more and more responsibility to the
[1:35] Iraqis. One of the brigades will stay
[1:37] home in Fort Riley, Kansas, although
[1:39] some of its soldiers will still go into
[1:41] Iraq as trainers. The other brigade is
[1:44] now in Kuwait and will stay there on
[1:46] call for possible emergencies. A measure
[1:48] of just how uncertain top American
[1:50] General George Casey is about the
[1:52] future. While we we felt comfortable
[1:54] enough not to bring him in, we wanted
[1:57] something close enough that could uh
[1:58] that could react quickly if something
[2:01] happened that we that we needed it.
[2:03] >> Combined with already announced plans to
[2:05] scale back forces that had been built up
[2:07] for the Iraqi elections, Casey says the
[2:10] 160,000 troops in Iraq on election day
[2:13] will be down to about 130,000 by March,
[2:17] the lowest since he took command more
[2:19] than a year and a half ago. In an effort
[2:21] to keep the pressure on for more
[2:22] withdrawals, Pentagon officials say
[2:24] Defense Secretary Rumsfeld plans to
[2:26] reassess troop levels every 3 months.
[2:29] With the next decision coming in March,
[2:31] it all depends on Iraqi troops and
[2:33] police holding their own against the
[2:35] insurgency. The Iraqi army has just
[2:37] launched its largest solo operation
[2:39] ever, a relatively modest force of
[2:42] several hundred troops. Suicide bombings
[2:45] are down from more than 60 last June to
[2:47] 16 so far this month. But the US has
[2:50] tried to pull out before. President Bush
[2:53] declared an end to major combat
[2:55] operations in May of 2003,
[2:57] >> only to have its exit plan overwhelmed
[3:00] by insurgent attacks which continue to
[3:02] this day. David Martin, CBS News, the
[3:05] Pentagon. When the president revealed
[3:08] the government had been easedropping on
[3:10] Americans without a warrant, he argued
[3:12] that it was legal because Congress had
[3:14] given him the authority when it passed a
[3:17] resolution allowing him to go to war
[3:19] against al Qaeda. The whole thing has
[3:21] caused an uproar in Congress and among
[3:23] the judges on the court that is supposed
[3:25] to issue such warrants. And today, the
[3:28] story took yet another turn. The author
[3:30] of the resolution said it gave the
[3:32] president no such authority. Here's Jim
[3:35] Stewart. Among the spy satellites
[3:38] operated by the National Security Agency
[3:40] are three camed trumpet that circle the
[3:43] Earth in elliptical orbits, easedropping
[3:45] specifically on cell phone calls. So by
[3:48] just what authority did the president
[3:50] allow those satellites to spy on calls
[3:52] by US citizens overseas without a
[3:55] warrant? The White House has insisted
[3:57] all week such authority was implicitly
[3:59] granted shortly after 9/11 when Congress
[4:02] approved a resolution allowing the
[4:04] president to use military force against
[4:06] al-Qaeda. But today, one of the authors
[4:09] of that resolution, former majority
[4:11] leader Senator Tom Dashel, said, "Hold
[4:13] on." That was stretching the point by a
[4:15] mile. In an opinion article for the
[4:18] Washington Post, Dashel wrote,
[4:19] "Warrantless wiretaps of American
[4:21] citizens never came up, and there was no
[4:24] mention of additional authority inside
[4:26] the United States in the resolution."
[4:28] Congress rushed home for the holidays
[4:30] last night, but it's a distinction
[4:32] certainly to be hashed out when they
[4:34] return and likely hold hearings on the
[4:36] issue. Another question certain to be
[4:38] asked is just what exactly did all that
[4:40] secret surveillance accomplish? So far,
[4:43] the White House has offered only one
[4:45] conflicting example. That was the case
[4:47] of I am Ferris, an Ohio truck driver and
[4:50] naturalized US citizen who pleaded
[4:52] guilty in 2003 to supporting al-Qaeda by
[4:55] planning to cut down the Brooklyn Bridge
[4:57] with a blowtorrch. "The NSA spy program
[5:00] was necessary because it helped uncover
[5:03] the Ferris plot," the White House told
[5:05] the New York Times, which broke the
[5:06] surveillance story. But last summer, the
[5:09] president gave credit for the Ferris
[5:11] case to the Patriot Act, which does
[5:13] require court approval for wire taps.
[5:15] >> They used the Patriot Act to discover
[5:17] that Ferris had cased possible targets
[5:20] in New in New York and that he' reported
[5:23] his findings to al-Qaeda.
[5:26] >> So the question would be, why wiretap
[5:28] someone secretly without a court order
[5:30] when you already had a court approved
[5:32] wiretap in the first place? So far, the
[5:34] administration hasn't come up with an
[5:36] answer for that one, Bob. All right,
[5:38] thank you, Jim. With all the recent talk
[5:40] about bird flu in Asia and fears it
[5:43] might spread here, it's no wonder that
[5:44] some people are being extra sensitive to
[5:47] signs of illness at this time of year.
[5:49] It is, after all, the season of
[5:51] sneezing. But is it the flu? And if it
[5:54] is, what kind? Jim Axelrod now with some
[5:57] answers.
[5:58] >> So, the fever could hit when?
[6:00] >> It may be the season's second most
[6:02] frequent line of questioning after what
[6:04] do you want for Christmas?
[6:05] >> Any cough? uh very little.
[6:08] >> Flu season's upon us. And while there
[6:10] are some pockets where it's hit a little
[6:12] harder than usual, like Los Angeles,
[6:14] >> a lot of hospitals are reporting very
[6:17] very heavy um overcrowding because a lot
[6:20] of people coming with flu-l like
[6:21] symptoms.
[6:22] >> Nationally, the flu numbers are not
[6:24] raising any red flags of concern,
[6:26] especially since this year the supply of
[6:28] vaccines is holding relatively steady. I
[6:32] dare say we're going to have a quite
[6:33] typical influenza season this year.
[6:36] >> So, if public health officials are using
[6:38] words like typical to describe the flu
[6:40] season, why are some emergency rooms in
[6:43] some parts of the country seeing spiking
[6:45] numbers already? Well, perhaps it's as
[6:48] much about what's up here as what's in
[6:50] here.
[6:51] >> I think it is that maybe that some
[6:53] people have heard about aven flu and are
[6:55] confused that that could be something
[6:57] here and that could be more serious. For
[6:58] what it's worth, there is no bird flu in
[7:00] the US. Not a single case in humans. Not
[7:04] even in US chickens for that matter. And
[7:06] no, you can't get bird flu from eating
[7:09] chicken.
[7:09] >> You have any boooos anywhere?
[7:12] >> Of course, the regular flu and its
[7:14] complications are always serious
[7:15] business. They put more than 2 million
[7:18] people in the hospital every year. And
[7:21] after all, t the season. I think the the
[7:24] gathering of families under one roof um
[7:27] and sharing of everything from pumpkin
[7:30] pie to a sneeze probably has something
[7:32] to do.
[7:33] >> But forget the aven flu. The only bird
[7:35] posing any threat is the piece of
[7:37] Christmas turkey shared with somebody
[7:39] already sick with the regular flu. Jim
[7:42] Axelrod, CBS News, New York. More
[7:45] stories are just a click away, but don't
[7:47] forget to join me on television for the
[7:49] on air edition of the CBS Evening News.
[7:51] On Monday's broadcast, Thailand hard hit
[7:54] by last year's tsunami, now hard at work
[7:57] on recovering and hoping for a new wave
[8:00] of tourists. For cbsnews.com,
[8:04] I'm Bob Sheeper.