The O'Reilly Factor (FNC) - 1999-06-04 (partial)
Channel: malgent
Transcript
Language: English (original, YouTube automatic captions)
[0:00] dramatically
[0:01] >> would help the situation dramatically.
[0:03] And of course, you remember the old
[0:04] line, a penny for your thoughts. Well,
[0:05] that's it for our panel whose thoughts
[0:07] are worth much more than a penny. And uh
[0:10] please join us next time here on Brid
[0:12] Hume Special Report. In the meantime,
[0:14] our news is next.
[0:26] The O'Reilly Factor. It's straight
[0:28] ahead. And tonight we'll factor in peace
[0:30] in Cassovo. Now that the ink is drawing
[0:32] on the agreement, is the time to stop
[0:34] bombing come? Hillary's going to run.
[0:36] But can she make it all the way to the
[0:38] Senate and the ugly truth about China on
[0:41] this the 10th anniversary of Tenement
[0:43] Square massacre? I'm Al Damato and I'm
[0:45] Ed Cotch and we're filling in for Bill
[0:47] O'Reilly. Those reports upcoming, but
[0:49] first the latest from the Fox News Desk.
[1:02] Hello everyone, I'm Todd Connor. Peace
[1:04] may be on the horizon, but Serb media
[1:06] says NATO kept up its attacks overnight.
[1:09] This comes only hours before a NATO
[1:11] meeting on the Serb troop pull out.
[1:13] Generals from NATO, Russia, and
[1:15] Yugoslavia are sitting down to work out
[1:17] the logistics. NATO says the fighting
[1:19] could be over by Sunday, and relief
[1:22] agencies are planning how to get the
[1:24] refugees back home safely.
[1:27] Investigators interviewed the co-pilot
[1:29] of the American Airlines jet that
[1:30] crashed in Arkansas this week. First
[1:33] officer Michael Orel says everything was
[1:35] normal until the plane touched down.
[1:37] Nine people died when the plane crash
[1:39] landed. Well, not too many new jobs were
[1:42] created last month, but the jobless rate
[1:44] still went down. 11,000 new jobs were
[1:47] added to the payroll, making the
[1:48] unemployment rate fall onetenth of a
[1:50] percent. That means it's back down to a
[1:53] 29-year low of 4.2% 2% for non-farm
[1:56] jobs.
[1:57] And here's one patient you really don't
[1:59] want to get too angry. A tarantula from
[2:02] the National Aquarium in Baltimore
[2:04] needed a CAT scan. The vets are trying
[2:07] to cure a nasty infection. They found
[2:09] it's getting worse. So, the eight-legged
[2:11] creature goes under the knife next week.
[2:13] And believe it or not, this is the
[2:15] spider's second cat scan. We'll have
[2:18] another update coming up at the bottom
[2:20] of the hour. Stay tuned now for the
[2:22] O'Reilly Factor with guest host Ed Cotch
[2:24] and Al Damato.
[2:37] Good evening and welcome to the O'Reilly
[2:39] Factor. I'm Al Damato filling in for
[2:41] Bill along with my great pal, Mayor Ed
[2:44] Cotch. Now, you're probably asking
[2:46] yourself, why are these two hosting
[2:48] O'Reilly? And the answer to that is
[2:51] simple. Why not? That's right, Al. We've
[2:54] got plenty in store for you. So, let's
[2:56] get right to it. The top story tonight,
[2:59] the peace agreement in Kosovo. There's
[3:01] no celebrating yet, despite Yugoslavia's
[3:04] acceptance of the peace plan. The latest
[3:06] from Washington is that the air campaign
[3:09] might end by Sunday. Question, should we
[3:12] stop? Joining us from Boston with
[3:15] insight is Colonel David Hunt. Colonel
[3:17] Hunt was with the American
[3:19] commanderin-chief in Bosnia, overseeing
[3:22] the peace agreement there from 1994 to
[3:25] 1998. And joining us from Washington is
[3:28] Daniel Spearac, director of the
[3:30] Institute for Balkan Affairs. Welcome.
[3:33] >> Hi.
[3:34] >> Good, good to have you both with us. Let
[3:36] me ask you, should we stop the bombing
[3:38] and when? And I give it to you, Colonel.
[3:40] What do you think?
[3:41] >> No, don't stop.
[3:42] >> Don't stop. Absolutely. Don't stop the
[3:44] bombing until you get verification on
[3:46] the ground that the uh fry, the former
[3:48] Republic of Yugoslavia soldiers and the
[3:50] MUPS, the paramilitary are out.
[3:53] >> Well,
[3:54] Colonel, would you distinguish between
[3:56] uh civil uh uh items in the capital as
[4:02] opposed to in Kosovo itself?
[4:04] >> No, I I they all have to be out. The
[4:07] paramilitary and the civilian, the
[4:09] police and the military cause equal
[4:12] amounts of damage. The military does it
[4:14] with uh large artillery pieces and
[4:16] tanks. And the military the the uh
[4:19] >> but Colonel, do you remember the movie
[4:21] All Quiet on the Western Front uh when
[4:23] the last American uh soldier, the last
[4:27] German soldier um were killed just
[4:31] before the armist? Remember that?
[4:33] >> Do we want that to happen here?
[4:36] >> Absolutely not. I don't want to see any
[4:37] of any any soldier any US soldier or or
[4:40] NATO soldier killed for any reason.
[4:42] >> But so long as the war goes on uh people
[4:44] are being killed, right?
[4:45] >> Yeah. But the issue is that we allegedly
[4:48] if you wish to impose your will, in this
[4:51] case NATO's will on someone, in this
[4:53] case the fry. Um that that that is what
[4:57] we've been trying to do. It's
[4:58] unfortunately being done from the air.
[5:00] But if you want to continue to impose
[5:02] your will and get done what you say you
[5:04] want to get done, then you keep pressure
[5:05] on them. Keep your foot in their neck.
[5:07] >> Let's turn to uh Danielle. Danielle, uh
[5:10] do you believe uh that uh Melasovich
[5:14] will keep the agreement?
[5:16] >> Well, I believe that if the Yugoslav
[5:17] Parliament voted on it, they will keep
[5:19] to the agreement. But the problem at
[5:21] this point is that there are no winners.
[5:22] Nobody's a winner. Certainly not NATO
[5:24] after it's been bombing Yugoslavia,
[5:26] destroying it for months now. 1,200
[5:29] civilians killed, a third of them are
[5:31] children. I don't think there are any
[5:32] winners here. The problem NATO is going
[5:34] to have even when it goes into Kosovo is
[5:36] the same problem the Yugoslav army is
[5:38] having, which is namely the KLA are
[5:40] continuously trying to infiltrate
[5:41] themselves from Albania. So NATO is
[5:43] going to find itself trying to fight off
[5:44] the KLA. So this is a much more complex
[5:47] issue than a lot of people.
[5:49] >> Danielle, would you agree uh that
[5:51] Mallich is responsible for uh genocidal
[5:54] acts against the ethnic Albanians? No, I
[5:56] think that's part of the Clinton
[5:57] administration propaganda. I mean, they
[5:59] were negotiating with him.
[6:00] >> How do you think those 850 Danielle, how
[6:02] do you think those 850,000
[6:05] ethnic Albanians took to the road and
[6:07] are now refugees in Macedonia and
[6:10] Albania? Did they do it because they
[6:11] liked it?
[6:12] >> The same way 100 thou thousand 100
[6:15] thousand Serbs took to the roads from
[6:17] Kosovo, they're refugees as well. You
[6:19] know, they're Albanian refugees in other
[6:20] parts of Yugoslavia. Other Albanians are
[6:22] living as Yugoslav citizens. there's a
[6:25] war on and there's refugees when there's
[6:27] fighting and actually the refugees the
[6:28] vast majority of them was after NATO
[6:30] bombing started my own family to NATO
[6:33] bomb that's the reality
[6:34] >> Danielle the New York Times did an
[6:36] extraordinary uh spread last week and
[6:40] which they talked to refugees and do you
[6:44] deny the fact uh that young ethnic
[6:46] Albanians have been shot by the Serbs um
[6:51] who were seeking to flee that is the
[6:53] Albanians were that women have been
[6:55] raped, that there's been ethnic
[6:57] cleansing. You don't think any of that's
[6:59] true?
[6:59] >> Well, there are certain stories, I'm
[7:00] sure, of harassment. You you know, you
[7:02] have a lot of uh similar situations in
[7:04] wartime of revenge and horrible things
[7:06] happening in war. But the problem with
[7:08] New York Times spread is they never show
[7:10] the Serbs who have been killed by the
[7:11] Ka, terrorized by the Ka
[7:14] made into this big propaganda to justify
[7:16] these NATO attacks against a sovereign
[7:18] country. Well, you know, Danielle, let
[7:20] me let me say this, and I don't want to
[7:22] beating up on you. Um, there's no doubt
[7:25] in my mind that there has been a
[7:27] propaganda war waged by the
[7:29] administration and others. But there's
[7:30] also no doubt in my mind, uh, that there
[7:33] has been ethnic cleansing systematically
[7:36] being used, uh, the rape of of women in
[7:39] communities to terrorize them and to let
[7:41] them know you better get up and get out
[7:42] because this is going to happen to you.
[7:44] uh the destruction of men just simply
[7:47] because they're ethnic Albanians, even
[7:49] those who had nothing to do with the
[7:50] Kal. And so so there's no doubt about
[7:52] that. But the the the fact remains,
[7:55] should we stop the bombing and provide
[7:57] an opportunity and test Malloish to see
[8:00] whether or not he is going to begin to
[8:02] withdraw. Uh obviously you think the
[8:04] bombing shouldn't have even begun.
[8:07] And you don't you don't think the
[8:08] bombing should stop.
[8:10] >> Is that right?
[8:10] >> No, I think also we we're reinventing
[8:12] history here. In fairness to the Serbs,
[8:14] there was certainly a lot of bad things
[8:16] done to the Serbs in the Cena in the
[8:18] early '90s and in the early '7s by the
[8:20] Albanians to the Serbs. There's no
[8:21] question the Serbs have been malign had
[8:24] bad things happen to them. However, it
[8:25] does not excuse the uh the type of
[8:28] carnage that was created by the Bosnian
[8:30] Serbs and the Yugoslav Serbs in Bosnia.
[8:33] There were over 800 mass graves in
[8:35] Bosnia.
[8:36] >> I uncovered I uncovered just one. It was
[8:38] 2500 people massacred by the fry.
[8:42] Bosnia.
[8:43] >> Colonel, uh, many Americans say a plague
[8:45] on both your houses. You're each killing
[8:47] one another. Why should American
[8:50] soldiers be placed in danger? Uh, when
[8:53] today it's the Serves against the
[8:55] Albanians and tomorrow it's the
[8:57] Albanians against the Serves.
[8:58] >> I mean, that's a fair argument. The
[9:00] issue is that no one wants to see any
[9:01] American soldiers killed. The point is
[9:03] though, if you're going to conduct a
[9:04] war, if you're going you're going to
[9:06] impose your will, then it has to be done
[9:08] from both the air and the ground. My
[9:10] point is the point is that clearly the
[9:12] Serbs have had things happen to them. It
[9:14] doesn't excuse the conduct of these of
[9:16] these people most recently in Kosovo and
[9:19] very recently in Bosnia.
[9:20] >> We're going to be back incredibly bad.
[9:22] We're going to be back in just a moment
[9:24] because we're going to get into this uh
[9:27] where and how just how much uh with
[9:29] Colonel Hunt and Miss Fremac in a moment
[9:32] and later. What about Hillary and 2000?
[9:35] Is she going to run? Uh, but is is she
[9:38] going to fall? That's the story and more
[9:40] as the factor continues.
[9:52] Nasty storm.
[9:54] Wet road. Looks pretty bad, huh? No
[9:58] problem.
[10:00] That's the beauty of Subaru all-wheel
[10:02] drive. The ultimate safety feature.
[10:06] Thanks, kid. See, it automatically
[10:08] transfers power from the wheels that
[10:10] slip to the wheels that grip. And only
[10:12] Subaru puts it on every car they make.
[10:15] And that's no accident. Subaru, the
[10:18] beauty of all-wheel drive.
[10:22] >> Morning seems so much brighter after a
[10:24] good night's sleep. That's why I love my
[10:27] Tylenol PM. Sometimes I have trouble
[10:30] sleeping. Um, I used to worry about
[10:32] taking something. how would I feel in
[10:34] the morning? And then I tried Tylenol
[10:37] PM. It stops my pain and helps me sleep.
[10:41] So in the morning, I'm rested,
[10:44] refreshed, ready to make the most of my
[10:46] day.
[10:48] >> Rest easy. It's Tylenol P.M.
[10:54] >> Okay, now you're talking. It's the new
[10:56] Hoover wet dryback with exclusive two
[10:58] tank system driven by a full six peak
[11:01] horsepower motor. No other work vac puts
[11:03] so much power to such good use. Only the
[11:06] Hoover wet dry vac offers the twotank
[11:08] system that puts wet in the wet tank and
[11:10] dry in the dry tank. It's as easy as
[11:13] ABC. No mix, no mess, no mud. Just drain
[11:16] the big 16gallon no rust wet tank and
[11:19] dump the dry. You simply can't do that
[11:21] with any other workback. And here's
[11:23] another neat trick. And one more. A
[11:25] detachable blower is standard. A full
[11:27] six peak horsepower clean driveways,
[11:30] walks, and lawn. The 12piece onboard
[11:32] tool set is standard too and the wide
[11:34] set no tip casters and the reusable
[11:36] cartridge filter. It's all yours for
[11:39] just three easy payments of only 4333.
[11:42] It's the Hoover wet dryback with
[11:44] exclusive two tank system. It's a whole
[11:46] basement garage and workshop full of
[11:48] reasons why deep down you want Hoover.
[11:51] >> Saturday, it's what the others don't
[11:53] want you to see and only what Fox can
[11:55] give you. Powerful news, complete
[11:58] coverage. It can only be Fox News
[12:00] Channel. Time to fasten your millennium
[12:02] thinking caps and prepare yourself for
[12:04] the quiz. It's the kind of history
[12:07] that'll give you big reasons to smile.
[12:09] And speaking of history, you never know
[12:11] just who's going to show up. Hey Joe,
[12:13] what do you know? It's a whole new look
[12:15] at the good old days. This weekend on
[12:17] the Colossal Movie Tone Quiz Show with
[12:20] Pat Cooper.
[12:23] Welcome back to the Factor. I'm Ed Cotch
[12:25] filling in for Bill along with my pal
[12:28] Aldamato and we're discussing the peace
[12:30] agreement in Kosovo with Colonel David
[12:32] Hunt and Danielle Shrimac from the
[12:35] Institute for Balkan Affairs.
[12:38] Uh let's go back to uh Danielle. Um, you
[12:42] know, there are two sides to this and
[12:44] there's no question that the uh Serves
[12:47] can say, why didn't the world speak out
[12:50] when the Croatians were torturing us and
[12:53] uh throwing us out? Where were you at
[12:56] that time? Were you bringing it to the
[12:57] attention of the world? I'm not faulting
[12:59] you. I'm just asking for historical uh
[13:02] reasons.
[13:03] >> I actually tried to to explain what was
[13:06] happening in Croatia. Uh even today over
[13:08] half a million serves from Croatia
[13:11] remain refugees and have yet to return
[13:13] to their homes. They're not allowed to
[13:14] return to their homes. And actually the
[13:15] war crimes tribunal looked into the uh
[13:17] actions of the Croatian army and found a
[13:20] great deal of war crimes have been
[13:21] committed. But as you say, you know,
[13:22] there is a double standard here and I
[13:24] think Croatia is useful to the Clinton
[13:26] administration in terms of Bosnia. So
[13:28] they're not pushing that uh aspect of of
[13:30] >> right. And a question you have every
[13:32] right to ask is why isn't Tudman uh
[13:36] indicted as a war criminal? Why only
[13:39] Malassovvich? That's the question.
[13:41] >> Exactly. And you know you have to look
[13:42] at two things. For example, you have
[13:43] Malloich and the Yugoslav army fighting
[13:45] a war against the Ka and some civilians
[13:48] have been killed and you can call that
[13:49] collateral damage. You have Clinton
[13:51] fighting a war against Malloich in
[13:52] Yugoslavia and he's calling you know
[13:54] 1,200 people killed collateral damage. I
[13:56] don't see much of a difference when
[13:58] you're fighting a war against somebody
[13:59] and you're killing civilians. It's as
[14:00] much of a crime on one side as in
[14:02] another.
[14:02] >> Well, I must say this. Uh I don't agree
[14:05] with the president that you can fight a
[14:07] war uh and not uh be prepared to suffer
[14:10] uh casualties. War is terrible. But you
[14:13] don't go into it unless you are prepared
[14:16] to fight it as a war. It cannot uh be uh
[14:19] that uh when the Yugoslavs cross over
[14:22] the border into Macedonia and take three
[14:25] American soldiers prisoners that we can
[14:27] say, "Oh, no, you broke the rules. We're
[14:30] allowed to bomb you, but you're not
[14:32] allowed to cross over uh into the
[14:35] Macedonian side." It's ridiculous.
[14:37] >> What do you say to that, Colonel? And
[14:39] and let me ask you, Colonel, I'll put
[14:40] you on the spot.
[14:41] >> Go ahead. If you had uh your brothers,
[14:45] what would you have? Would you have
[14:46] conducted this operation this way or
[14:48] would you have um brought together a
[14:53] greater compliment including ground
[14:55] troops on the borders, including more
[14:57] tactical air support? Um what would you
[15:00] have done differently?
[15:01] >> Nobody no the answer directly. Nobody in
[15:02] uniform would would have re should have
[15:05] been recommending this conduct. It was
[15:07] done to keep everyone keep our people
[15:09] out of harm's way. But it's no question
[15:10] that if you're going to do this, you do
[15:12] it with a combined arms. Air, ground,
[15:14] sea, everything you've got. You pour on
[15:16] these people. Again, if you decide
[15:18] politically that you want to go to war
[15:20] against anyone, it has to be a
[15:22] >> You think this operation was conducted
[15:24] in the manner that it should have been?
[15:26] >> No. No. Absolutely not.
[15:27] >> I mean, and it has caused we maybe may
[15:31] cause uh the fry and Mallich to do what
[15:35] they have signed. I doubt it. It didn't
[15:37] happen in Bosnia. Um, the only reason
[15:39] they got him to the peace table is with
[15:41] the Croats were attacking from the north
[15:43] and we bombed him in the south.
[15:44] >> And And you had a huge presence, right?
[15:47] A huge uh ground presence that was being
[15:50] put together with overwhelming
[15:52] firepower. So he understood
[15:53] >> well there was 60,000 we were putting in
[15:55] there um when when they finally decided
[15:58] to do date after Dayton. But the conduct
[16:01] of this was politically. I mean when as
[16:03] you know the knack runs that and you
[16:05] have to get 19 countries to agree. But
[16:07] but the issue of who's more guilty. I
[16:10] mean clearly the Croats and the Muslims
[16:13] and the Serbs conducted some very
[16:15] terrible things in Bosnia. There's no
[16:18] question that all three um those people
[16:20] could be indicted. But the num but you
[16:22] have to you have to uncover be around a
[16:25] mass grave as I have and they will those
[16:27] people up in up in uh Pela Farms
[16:30] northeast Bosnia were killed by the
[16:31] Dina. We have them on silent imagery
[16:33] killed 2500 people. That's just one.
[16:36] There's eight of those kind of mass craz
[16:37] around. This is not ancient history.
[16:40] It's recent history.
[16:40] >> You're right, Colonel. And Colonel, we
[16:42] want to thank you and Miss Remac. Thank
[16:44] you very, very much.
[16:57] The computer confronts failure.
[17:02] Failure attacks.
[17:05] An opposing force neutralizes failure,
[17:08] reversing its energy,
[17:11] rendering its intentions
[17:14] useless.
[17:15] >> Running the unstoppable Windows NT.
[17:20] The HP Vector PC with Pentium 3
[17:22] processor.
[17:27] Looks like another scorcher.
[17:30] Hey, Mrs. Johnson.
[17:34] You'd be surprised how much the right
[17:36] air conditioner can save on your monthly
[17:38] cooling costs.
[17:44] >> American Standard. Cutting the cost to
[17:46] cool. Learn how to choose the air
[17:48] conditioning and heating system that's
[17:49] right for your home. Call 1800-270-4528
[17:53] for your free at home with comfort
[17:55] video.
[17:58] >> Stuart, can I see you in my office,
[18:00] please?
[18:00] >> That kid is sick. That just squeaks.
[18:02] Very sick.
[18:03] >> Steuart, get in here. Is there a thing,
[18:04] Mr. P?
[18:06] >> Stuart, I just opened my Ammerit trade
[18:08] account.
[18:09] >> Let's light this candle. Let's go to
[18:10] aatrade.com.
[18:12] It's easier than phone and love. What do
[18:14] you feel like buying today, Mr. P?
[18:16] >> Kmart.
[18:16] >> So, research it. All this stuff is
[18:18] provided for you free of charge.
[18:19] >> No cost.
[18:20] >> Yeah, that's synonymous with free.
[18:21] >> Looks like a good stock.
[18:22] >> Let's buy.
[18:23] >> Let's buy 100 shares.
[18:24] >> All right. Click it in there.
[18:25] >> How about 500?
[18:26] >> 100 stores.
[18:28] >> You feel the excitement? You're about to
[18:30] buy a stock. Okay,
[18:31] >> fabulous. I'm thrilled. What did that
[18:33] cost me?
[18:34] >> $8, my man.
[18:35] >> Mike Broker charges me $200.
[18:37] >> Riding the wave of the future, my man. I
[18:39] got to eat soda. I'm sorry, Mr. Fen.
[18:41] Having a party on Saturday night if you
[18:43] really want to go.
[18:44] >> I'm going to try and get there.
[18:45] >> Happy trading.
[18:46] >> Thank you.
[18:46] >> Rock on.
[18:47] >> All right, Stewart.
[18:48] >> Call toll-free 8005739914
[18:51] or visit ameritrade.com. Ameritrade, the
[18:54] way to trade. Period.
[19:00] Now, Cornerstone Promotions brings you
[19:02] rocking instrumentals featuring 34 of
[19:04] your alltime jukebox favorites.
[19:20] These are the songs that bring back
[19:22] magical memories.
[19:26] 34 original hits by the original artist
[19:29] together in this one great collection.
[19:40] Rockin Instrumentals is not sold in
[19:42] stores. Here's how to order.
[19:45] Call this toll-free number now for
[19:46] Rocking Instrumentals. Two cassettes
[19:48] 1998. Two CDs 26.98 plus $4.95 shipping.
[19:52] Have your credit card ready and call
[19:54] now.
[19:57] Welcome back to the factor. I'm former
[19:59] New York City Mayor Ed Cotch and sitting
[20:01] alongside of me is my friend Al Damato
[20:04] and in the personal story segment
[20:06] tonight, Congressman Bob Bar, a member
[20:08] of the now famous judiciary committee
[20:10] and one of the president's harshest
[20:12] critics, the congressman joins us now
[20:14] from Atlanta. Welcome, Congressman.
[20:16] >> Well, go ahead. It's great. It's great
[20:18] to be with you. the uh both of you are
[20:20] great heroes of mine uh for for what you
[20:23] both have stood up for over the years
[20:24] and it's an honor to be with you.
[20:26] >> You're very nice to say that. I want to
[20:27] ask you this question and and it's meant
[20:30] to to inform the audience. Why did the
[20:33] Republicans take the position uh that uh
[20:36] you ought not to require a background
[20:39] check of people who buy guns at gun
[20:42] shows so as to weed out uh the lunatics
[20:47] and the felons? What what's the
[20:49] philosophical reason to exclude gun
[20:52] shows uh from uh the background check?
[20:55] >> I don't think that it was a
[20:56] philosophical problem that most of us as
[20:59] Republicans have with requiring uh
[21:02] background checks for gun sales by gun
[21:04] dealers at gun shows. Uh uh I think the
[21:08] real problem was in the details of it.
[21:10] The versions that were floating around
[21:12] over in the Senate and which ultimately
[21:14] the Senate passed and which has now come
[21:16] over to the House. uh really excuse me
[21:20] uh go far a field of the basic uh
[21:22] notion. Uh they get involved in allowing
[21:25] for gun fees for transfers. They get
[21:28] into providing a lot more paperwork
[21:30] power for the government. Uh they get
[21:33] involved in uh sales that aren't
[21:35] legitimate sales. Uh if they had just
[21:38] stuck to the basic notion of saying,
[21:40] "Okay, this sale would require a
[21:43] background check on the outside.
[21:45] Therefore, it ought to require a check
[21:46] on the inside. Uh there wouldn't have
[21:48] been any problem. And hopefully that's
[21:50] what we'll get back to.
[21:51] >> But Congressman, if that were really the
[21:53] case, why didn't the Republicans, they
[21:55] are the majority in both houses, why
[21:58] didn't they offer an appropriate
[21:59] amendment to do it the way you suggest?
[22:02] Instead, while background checks existed
[22:05] everywhere else, the uh gun shows and
[22:09] the porn shops for redeeming your guns
[22:11] or buying your guns were excluded. any
[22:14] American watching that debate would come
[22:17] to the conclusion that the people who
[22:20] refused to support including those two
[22:23] uh areas of gun sales were nuts. Well,
[22:27] of course, also with all due respect to
[22:29] a lot of those folks over over on the
[22:31] other side that made a big deal out of
[22:32] this, none of this gets to the real nub
[22:35] of the question that that that should
[22:37] occur in our minds as the result of what
[22:39] happened in Coline. It was not lack of
[22:42] laws that relate to gun shows because
[22:44] the gun purchases that that were used in
[22:47] the Coline case. That was already an
[22:50] illegal transfer. It was already
[22:52] illegal. The problem that I have with
[22:54] the way the Republicans very frankly are
[22:56] allowing this whole debate to play out
[22:58] is we're being drawn into a debate over
[23:01] the minutia of gun control laws and
[23:04] we're losing sight of the big picture.
[23:06] >> Well, well, Bob, let me ask you this.
[23:09] you you know it is perception that
[23:11] counts so often because it becomes
[23:13] reality to to many people. Why shouldn't
[23:17] Republicans support gunlocks for
[23:19] example? Are you going to oppose that?
[23:21] >> Uh the the the fact of the matter is
[23:24] requiring gunlocks to be included in the
[23:26] box that somebody gets a gun in is
[23:29] meaningless. Uh no. I mean if people
[23:30] want to buy gun locks, if we want to say
[23:32] they ought to include it, fine. But
[23:34] that's that's one of those feelood
[23:36] things that
[23:36] >> That's right, Bob. Listen, I I mean, I'm
[23:38] not arguing with you about it. I I'm I'm
[23:41] saying to you, I don't think it's going
[23:42] to cut down crime and it may in in terms
[23:46] of the impact on society be minimal. But
[23:49] why should the Republicans be tabbed
[23:52] with this philosophy of of being the the
[23:55] uh the dupe, so to speak, of the NRA and
[23:58] and therefore even opposed to a very
[24:01] modest provision that says you got to
[24:02] have a gunlock. What What is the big
[24:05] deal? Now those I I don't disagree with
[24:07] you in terms that this is not going to
[24:09] address the core issues of
[24:12] responsibility
[24:14] of of really inculcating our children in
[24:17] society with the respect for for each
[24:19] and every individual and all of that
[24:21] that comes with it. But don't you see
[24:23] what takes place and how it's used and
[24:25] how we're bashed by and Republicans are
[24:28] cast as being guys who are going to
[24:30] protect the NRA and people with with all
[24:33] kinds of weapons. simple thing like the
[24:35] gunlock, will you vote for it or against
[24:37] it?
[24:38] >> Well, I mean, I have I have no problem
[24:39] with gunlocks, but it does it's not, as
[24:41] you say, it's not going to do anything.
[24:43] My problem with where the Republican
[24:45] party is in both the House and the
[24:47] Senate right now, Senator, is that we're
[24:50] being drawn into these debates. We're
[24:52] not defining the playing field. We're
[24:54] not leading the debate. We're following
[24:56] the debate. And we could be
[24:58] accomplishing so much if we didn't let
[25:00] ourselves be drawn into arguing over
[25:02] >> minutia. How would you lead that debate?
[25:04] Tell me where where you would go if you
[25:06] had your brothers.
[25:07] >> First of all, I would I would provide
[25:08] for a select committee at least on the
[25:10] House side, similar to what we did in
[25:12] the Cox report. Uh have a series of
[25:15] substantive hearings, not a half a day,
[25:17] which is what we had in the House last
[25:19] week, and then move in sort of knee-jerk
[25:21] reaction to mark up a piece of
[25:23] legislation that nobody's even seen yet.
[25:26] have a series of debate, focus on
[25:27] several things such as okay, what is the
[25:30] exact scope of current gun laws? What
[25:33] particular areas are they that there
[25:35] that we need to focus on? Do we need to
[25:36] enhance punishment for juveniles
[25:38] committing serious violent felonies? Is
[25:41] the administration enforcing existing
[25:44] gun laws? If not, how can we make them
[25:46] do it? If they are, again, what
[25:48] additional laws, if any, are needed?
[25:50] >> Can I break in, Congressman, because
[25:51] we're running out of time in a moment.
[25:54] Uh would you agree uh that background
[25:57] checks uh are necessary and have proved
[25:59] to be helpful?
[26:01] >> I I think the instant background check
[26:03] has an excellent way of handling some of
[26:04] these problems that have come up.
[26:06] >> But if instant isn't available, then do
[26:10] you object to waiting 3 days?
[26:12] >> Yes, I do. I think that an inst because
[26:14] there are many instances where somebody
[26:17] choosing to exercise their right to
[26:18] defend themselves needs a firearm the
[26:21] same day. And if as long as they're not
[26:23] disqualified, I think the Constitution
[26:25] and Common Sense guarantees them the
[26:27] right to have it,
[26:28] >> even if felons and lunatics uh sneak
[26:32] under that uh period and get guns.
[26:35] >> Well, what Well, we have provided tens
[26:37] of millions of dollars for the
[26:38] government to develop an instant
[26:40] background check system. If they can't
[26:41] do it, then we ought to get new people
[26:43] in there.
[26:43] >> Bob, I want to thank you very very much
[26:45] and we look forward to those hearings
[26:47] next week. Next up, have they stolen our
[26:50] most sensitive military secrets? We're
[26:53] going to find out the ugly truth.
[26:56] >> How do you get rid of ugly stains on
[26:58] ceiling tiles? You simply spray them
[27:00] away. Incredible. It's true. With
[27:02] Instagon. Just spray it on and the stain
[27:05] is gone. No scrubbing, no rubbing. This
[27:07] textured ceiling is almost impossible.
[27:10] But Instagon gets rid of the problem in
[27:12] no time. Amazing. Don't scrub bathroom
[27:14] tiles. Even that grungy cocking comes
[27:17] sparkling clean with Instagon. What
[27:19] about Stuckco? Instagon gets into all
[27:21] those crevices and dissolves the grime
[27:23] away. It removes years of soot from
[27:25] fireplace walls and cleans PVC lawn
[27:28] furniture without any scrubbing. Ugly
[27:30] mildew gone in seconds. Instagon works
[27:33] safely, works instantly on all these
[27:35] surfaces. And it's yours for only
[27:37] $19.95. But call now and get two for
[27:40] $19.95. Order now
[27:42] >> to order Instagon. Have your credit card
[27:44] ready and call toll-free 1-8009961600
[27:46] or send check or money order for 1995
[27:48] plus4.95 shipping and handling to the
[27:50] address on your screen or call
[27:52] 18009961600.
[27:56] >> I'll see you.
[27:57] >> Hi, man. Me too.
[27:59] >> Me too.
[27:59] >> Ah, the credit card game. We've all
[28:01] played it.
[28:02] >> I'll go 5.9%.
[28:04] >> That an intro rate?
[28:05] >> Yeah.
[28:06] >> First you get a great introductory rate,
[28:08] but then it goes up.
[28:09] >> So you'll raise us to 17.9% in 6 months.
[28:12] Yeah,
[28:13] >> but now if you have good credit, you can
[28:15] win the credit card game by calling 1
[28:16] 800532-2255.
[28:19] >> Let's make it interesting.
[28:23] >> I'm out.
[28:24] >> I'm out.
[28:26] >> I'll call
[28:26] >> with the 9.9% fixed rate Visa Platinum
[28:29] card from Capital 1.
[28:32] >> That's a great hand.
[28:33] >> It's not an introductory rate. You get a
[28:35] low fixed rate you can trust, platinum
[28:37] perks, and no annual fee. Act now. Call
[28:39] 1 800532-22255.
[28:42] Transfer your highinterest balances to
[28:44] the 9.9% fixed rate Visa Platinum from
[28:47] Capital 1 and save hundreds, even
[28:49] thousands of dollars a year. Call
[28:51] 1800532-2255
[28:53] and win the credit card game this
[28:56] weekend.
[29:07] for the latest on today's top stories
[29:09] and breaking news here at home and
[29:11] around the world. Get it fair and
[29:13] balanced this weekend on Fox News Now.
[29:16] Questions, comments, or just want to
[29:17] speak out on today's issues? Visit Fox
[29:19] News viewer services at foxnews.com or
[29:22] call us at 1888-369-4762.
[29:26] >> We're back. That's right, Alato filling
[29:29] in for Bill along with my friend and
[29:31] buddy, Mayor Ed Cotch. And in the impact
[29:34] segment tonight, China's deadly
[29:36] intentions. Now that they have stolen
[29:38] our most sensitive military secrets,
[29:41] what do they intend to do with them?
[29:43] Joining us now from Washington are two
[29:45] men with keen insights into that
[29:47] situation. James Lily, former US
[29:49] ambassador to China, and Edward
[29:51] Timberlake, author of The Year of the
[29:54] Rat, which exposed the link between
[29:56] China's espionage and the campaign
[29:58] finance. Welcome, gentlemen. Let me ask
[30:01] you, you're the rat. You make some
[30:04] pretty serious allegations there. Get to
[30:08] the nub of it. Get right to the heart of
[30:10] it. What are you saying? Are you saying
[30:12] that that secrets uh were given to the
[30:16] uh Chinese in exchange for campaign
[30:19] contributions? Well, actually, I'm
[30:20] saying a little bit more uh directly,
[30:22] Senator, that the president of the
[30:24] United States took bribes and basically
[30:26] across the board compromised our
[30:28] national security.
[30:29] >> Stop right there. That's a pretty
[30:31] serious statement. I sir,
[30:33] >> tell me ex exactly what you mean when
[30:36] you say we he took bribes and
[30:39] compromised our national security.
[30:41] >> Certainly will. Um, I worked for
[30:42] Chairman Solomon over on the rules
[30:44] committee and uh during the course of
[30:46] the investigation we found individuals
[30:48] who have actually uh been found guilty
[30:51] now and and have been talking in front
[30:52] of Congress, Johnny Chong for one of
[30:54] them in which he admits he gave $50,000
[30:56] to the uh first lady's chief of staff
[30:59] and Chinese executives came into the
[31:01] president's radio address uh and the
[31:03] National Security Council emails talked
[31:06] very specifically about the joys of uh
[31:09] donor maintenance. Now, that's all
[31:10] illegal, of course, as you know. Uh,
[31:12] another case was the issue of Charlie
[31:14] Tree, another gentleman who's just pled
[31:16] out. Charlie Tree is a gangster out of
[31:18] Taiwan, was a fry cook in Little Rock.
[31:20] >> Well, but but let me make let me ask you
[31:23] a question now.
[31:25] They were guilty and have plead guilty
[31:27] to uh illegal campaign contributions.
[31:30] And in some cases, it would appear that
[31:32] the money came directly or certainly
[31:34] indirectly
[31:36] uh uh from China from China.
[31:38] >> Yes, sir. It now now but we said you
[31:42] said they compromise national security.
[31:44] Tell me where you make that linkage
[31:46] because that as far as I'm concerned is
[31:49] the key question.
[31:50] >> Correct. Yeah.
[31:51] >> And I'll give you the Charlie Tree
[31:52] example. Charlie Tree came in to the
[31:54] president's legal defense fund. His
[31:56] money is given by a fellow named Unlap
[31:58] Singh out of Macau. A guy who is a
[32:00] communist Chinese official. Also makes
[32:02] his money on gambling and prostitution.
[32:03] Wired millions to Mr. Tree. Tree gives
[32:06] $460,000 to the president's legal
[32:08] defense fund, which uh is directly money
[32:10] to Bill Clinton. I mean, there's no spin
[32:12] here. That's not hard money. That's not
[32:13] soft money. That's not political money.
[32:15] A dollar to your attorney is a dollar to
[32:17] you. When the money is delivered that
[32:19] afternoon, or actually at noon, he goes
[32:21] to lunch and meets a fellow who's pled
[32:22] the fifth uh who worked in the White
[32:24] House White House named Mark Middleton.
[32:26] Uh New York Times is reporting that uh
[32:28] there's allegations that 500,000 or so
[32:31] went to Mr. Middleton out of China and
[32:33] that's got to be resolved. But he handed
[32:34] Mr. Middleton a letter. Basically, it
[32:36] was the height of the Taiwan missile
[32:38] crisis. Missiles are bracketing the
[32:39] island of Taiwan in the water. Didn't
[32:41] hit the island proper. And carriers are
[32:43] going into harm's way. I went to the
[32:45] Naval Academy. My classmates are out
[32:46] there. And the letter was very bold and
[32:48] direct and provocative. Even Bill
[32:50] Clinton's team says it's provocative.
[32:52] And it had a very simple point.
[32:53] Actually, it had several, but the one
[32:55] point was, "Pay attention to this
[32:56] letter, Mr. President, or you'll have a
[32:58] tough time in 96." And about the third
[33:00] or fourth bullet basically said back off
[33:02] on Taiwan. China has a history of going
[33:05] to war over things like this remembering
[33:07] uh reminding the viewers uh that another
[33:10] general by the way had already
[33:11] threatened to say that uh is America
[33:13] prepared to trade LA for Taipei at the
[33:15] height of these crisis. So Tree delivers
[33:17] money and a letter.
[33:18] >> That's not a bribe and that's not a
[33:20] conspiracy on the part of the president.
[33:21] He may have not yet. Let me tell you
[33:23] what happened.
[33:23] >> But I have to give the ambassador uh I'm
[33:25] sorry an opportunity. Sure. Uh Mr.
[33:28] Ambassador, would you agree that the
[33:30] Chinese have engaged in espionage
[33:32] against us? And if you do, uh, don't we
[33:35] engage in espionage against them?
[33:39] >> Yes. The great game is played by both
[33:41] sides. I'm not saying they I played it
[33:43] against them. Sure. But are you trying
[33:46] to excuse them from what they did?
[33:47] >> I am. Not at all. I I think the the um
[33:51] attorney general should be compelled to
[33:53] resign for not uh supporting the uh
[33:57] application for a wiretap. But I don't
[33:59] think that simply because a country
[34:01] spies against us that we should say,
[34:04] "Oh, isn't the country terrible? We spy
[34:06] against them. It's the nature of the
[34:08] world." We're going to be back in just a
[34:11] moment. More with Ambassador Lily and
[34:12] Mr. Timberlake in just a moment. And
[34:14] then a subject I know a thing or two
[34:16] about. Running for the Senate in New
[34:18] York. Hillary says she's going to run,
[34:20] but can she win? It'll be one heck of a
[34:23] debate. We'll be right back.
[34:31] Hello everyone, I'm Todd Connor. Jerry
[34:33] Springer went around with Chicago's
[34:35] alderman. The lawmakers wanted to know
[34:37] more about the brawling on the Springer
[34:39] show.
[34:39] >> Tell us all that information.
[34:42] I will tell you that the fighting that
[34:45] you see on our show in no way ever,
[34:49] ever, ever glamorizes violence. Just the
[34:53] opposite.
[34:55] One alderman said, "If the violence on
[34:56] the show is for real, the guests should
[34:59] be arrested." Ever. Right now, get a
[35:02] large two topping pizza from Domino's
[35:04] for just $9.99. Add a second pizza for
[35:07] just $5.99. This offer won't last long,
[35:09] so call Domino's now.
[35:12] 995 JWJ with 50 minutes of music an
[35:15] hour.